Vattimo’s Renunciation of Violence
For Gianni Vattimo, the renunciation of violence is the starting point for constructing a post foundational politics. So far, criticism of Vattimo’s argument has focused on his larger commitment to metaphysical nihilism and whether the renunciation of violence is a thicker principle than his post fo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2013
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2013, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 99-111 |
| Further subjects: | B
Weak ontology
B Non lethal force B Violence B Post foundational politics B Gianni Vattimo |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785697102 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112044108.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-011-9324-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785697102 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785697102 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lindsey, Jason Royce |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Vattimo’s Renunciation of Violence |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a For Gianni Vattimo, the renunciation of violence is the starting point for constructing a post foundational politics. So far, criticism of Vattimo’s argument has focused on his larger commitment to metaphysical nihilism and whether the renunciation of violence is a thicker principle than his post foundational philosophy can support. I argue that Vattimo’s renunciation of violence can also be criticized for two other reasons. First, Vattimo attempts to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable uses of violence through an under developed idea of self-defense. Second, despite his attention to the political and philosophical impact of mass communications technology, Vattimo ignores emerging technological challenges to our understanding of violence. Nonetheless, I argue that Vattimo’s renunciation can still serve as a useful starting point for contemporary political thinking. What Vattimo’s logic shows is that we can enhance the moral standing of democracy by decisively detaching its practices and institutions from historical artifacts of political violence. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Non lethal force | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Violence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gianni Vattimo | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Weak ontology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Post foundational politics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 16(2013), 1, Seite 99-111 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2013 |g number:1 |g pages:99-111 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23356528 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9324-5 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033756000 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785697102 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044108 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#3517DDE7653E945934301D8321DFB3802C6C923B | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23356528 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
