On the Duties of Commission in Commercial Life. A Kantian Criticism of Moral Institutionalism

In latter-day discussions on corporate morality, duties of commission are fiercely debated. Moral institutionalists argue that duties of commission—such as a duty of assistance—overstep the boundaries of moral duty owed by economic agents. “Moral institutionalism” is a newly coined term for a famili...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Dubbink, Wim (Author) ; van de Ven, Bert (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2012
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2012, Volume: 15, Issue: 2, Pages: 221-238
Further subjects:B Duties of commission
B Market morality
B Invisibility of morality
B Corporate duties
B Moral institutionalism
B Kantian moral thinking
B Free markets
B Neo-classical (moral) thinking
B Liberalism
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785696637
003 DE-627
005 20220112044106.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-011-9283-x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785696637 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785696637 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dubbink, Wim  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a On the Duties of Commission in Commercial Life. A Kantian Criticism of Moral Institutionalism 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In latter-day discussions on corporate morality, duties of commission are fiercely debated. Moral institutionalists argue that duties of commission—such as a duty of assistance—overstep the boundaries of moral duty owed by economic agents. “Moral institutionalism” is a newly coined term for a familiar position on market morality. It maintains that market morality ought to be restricted, excluding all duties of commission. Neo-Classical thinkers such as Baumol and Homann defend it most eloquently. They underpin their position with concerns that go to the core of liberalism—the dominant western political theory that sustains the ideals of both the free market and the free, rational person. Those authors claim that liberalism calls for a fully differentiated market because it resents the politicization of the market. Fully differentiated markets exclude duties of commission. They also claim that full differentiation of the market closes the troublesome gap between moral motivation and moral virtue. Full differentiation redeems the promise of “easy virtue”. In this paper moral institutionalism will be rejected from a Kantian point of view, mostly inspired by Herman’s thesis on the invisibility of morality. Liberalism may perhaps ban the politicization of the market; it does not forbid its moralization. The idea of a fully differentiated market must also be rejected because it is either morally over-demanding (to the morally autonomous person) or morally hazardous (to the person with failing moral motivation). Contrary to what the moral institutionalists claim, right action, morally, is actually quite difficult in fully differentiated markets. 
601 |a Institution 
650 4 |a Corporate duties 
650 4 |a Kantian moral thinking 
650 4 |a Moral institutionalism 
650 4 |a Neo-classical (moral) thinking 
650 4 |a Liberalism 
650 4 |a Invisibility of morality 
650 4 |a Duties of commission 
650 4 |a Market morality 
650 4 |a Free markets 
700 1 |a van de Ven, Bert  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 15(2012), 2, Seite 221-238  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2012  |g number:2  |g pages:221-238 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474521  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9283-x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033755535 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785696637 
LOK |0 005 20220112044106 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#A158A351DEA0316E94A8E41577472268C749C80F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474521 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw