Humanizing Personhood

This paper explores the debate between personists, who argue that the concept of a person if of central importance for moral thought, and personists, who argue that the concept of a human being is of greater moral significance. On the one hand, it argues that normative naturalism, the most ambitious...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kadlac, Adam (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: 2010
En: Ethical theory and moral practice
Año: 2010, Volumen: 13, Número: 4, Páginas: 421-437
Otras palabras clave:B Personism
B Moral Status
B Moral Theory
B Humanism
B Personhood
Acceso en línea: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1785695754
003 DE-627
005 20220112044102.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-009-9214-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785695754 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785695754 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kadlac, Adam  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Humanizing Personhood 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper explores the debate between personists, who argue that the concept of a person if of central importance for moral thought, and personists, who argue that the concept of a human being is of greater moral significance. On the one hand, it argues that normative naturalism, the most ambitious defense of the humanist position, fails to identify moral standards with standards of human behavior and thereby fails to undermine the moral significance of personhood. At the same time, it contends that a more focused attention on the morally relevant features of human life may indeed play a crucial role in enhancing our moral understanding. 
650 4 |a Moral Status 
650 4 |a Personism 
650 4 |a Humanism 
650 4 |a Moral Theory 
650 4 |a Personhood 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 13(2010), 4, Seite 421-437  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2010  |g number:4  |g pages:421-437 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835360  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9214-2  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033754652 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785695754 
LOK |0 005 20220112044102 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#896649447710BA895D5F87A9DC3326C5DF466AC0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835360 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw