Why Be Immoral?
Developing themes in the work of Thomas Hill, I argue that servility is an underappreciated but pervasive reason for moral transgression. Recognizing servility as a basic cause of immorality obliges us to reconsider questions about the rationality of morality. Traditional answers to the problem of t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2010
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2010, Volume: 13, Issue: 2, Pages: 191-205 |
| Further subjects: | B
Thomas Hill
B Servility B Practical identity B the normative question |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785695592 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112044101.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-009-9183-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785695592 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785695592 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Freiman, Christopher |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Freiman, Christopher | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why Be Immoral? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Developing themes in the work of Thomas Hill, I argue that servility is an underappreciated but pervasive reason for moral transgression. Recognizing servility as a basic cause of immorality obliges us to reconsider questions about the rationality of morality. Traditional answers to the problem of the immoralist, which tend to be stated in terms of enlightened self-interest, fail to properly engage the problems posed by 'servile immorality.' In response to these problems, I develop a Humean version of a traditionally Kantian strategy for substantiating the rationality of morality: (i.e.) agents' conceptions of themselves commit them to accepting morality's authority. Servile behavior implies cognitive dissonance, which can restructure or dissolve those particular desires, beliefs, and projects that constitute agents' most highly valued contingent conceptions of themselves. I conclude that agents have reason to abstain from servility even on a parsimonious Humean account of practical reasons. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a the normative question | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thomas Hill | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Practical identity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Servility | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 13(2010), 2, Seite 191-205 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g pages:191-205 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602555 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9183-5 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 13 |j 2010 |e 2 |h 191-205 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033754490 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785695592 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044101 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#F77AC78939580E2B728BB0D556057E2932EA4A08 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602555 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||