Fitting Attitude Analyses of Value and the Partiality Challenge
According to ‘Fitting Attitude’ (FA) analyses of value, for an object to be valuable is for that object to have properties—other than its being valuable—that make it a fitting object of certain responses. In short, if an object is positively valuable it is fitting to favour it; if an object is negat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2009
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2009, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Pages: 365-378 |
Further subjects: | B
A. C. Ewing
B Ought B Fittingness B Value B FA analyses B Wrong kind of reason problem B Partiality |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785695231 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220112044100.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-009-9176-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785695231 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785695231 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Olson, Jonas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fitting Attitude Analyses of Value and the Partiality Challenge |
264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a According to ‘Fitting Attitude’ (FA) analyses of value, for an object to be valuable is for that object to have properties—other than its being valuable—that make it a fitting object of certain responses. In short, if an object is positively valuable it is fitting to favour it; if an object is negatively valuable it is fitting to disfavour it. There are several variants of FA analyses. Some hold that for an object to be valuable is for it to be such that it ought to be favoured; others hold that value is analyzable in terms of reasons or requirements to favour. All these variants of the FA analysis are subject to a partiality challenge: there are circumstances in which some agents have reasons to favour or disfavour some object—due to the personal relations in which they stand to the object—without this having any bearing on the value of the object. A. C. Ewing was one of the first philosophers to draw attention to the partiality challenge for FA analyses. In this paper I explain the challenge and consider Ewing's responses, one of which is preferable to the other, but none of which is entirely satisfactory. I go on to develop an alternative Brentano-inspired response that Ewing could have offered and that may well be preferable to the responses Ewing actually did offer. | ||
601 | |a Challenger | ||
650 | 4 | |a Wrong kind of reason problem | |
650 | 4 | |a Value | |
650 | 4 | |a Partiality | |
650 | 4 | |a Ought | |
650 | 4 | |a Fittingness | |
650 | 4 | |a FA analyses | |
650 | 4 | |a A. C. Ewing | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 12(2009), 4, Seite 365-378 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2009 |g number:4 |g pages:365-378 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40284304 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9176-4 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 403375413X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785695231 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112044100 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#2188D753949595AA4633AB43CC27CC836496F5B0 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40284304 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |