Goodness, Values, Reasons
Contemporary value theory has been characterized by a renewed interest in the analysis of concepts like “good” or “valuable”, the most prominent pattern of analysis in recent years being the socalled buck-passing or fitting-attitude analysis which reduces goodness to a matter of having properties th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2009
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2009, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Pages: 329-343 |
Further subjects: | B
Goodness
B Analysis B Value B Buck-passing B Attributive |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785695215 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220112044100.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-009-9175-5 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785695215 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785695215 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Brännmark, Johan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Goodness, Values, Reasons |
264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Contemporary value theory has been characterized by a renewed interest in the analysis of concepts like “good” or “valuable”, the most prominent pattern of analysis in recent years being the socalled buck-passing or fitting-attitude analysis which reduces goodness to a matter of having properties that provide reasons for pro-attitudes. Here I argue that such analyses are best understood as metaphysical rather than linguistic and that while the buck-passing analysis has some virtues, it still fails to provide a suitably wide-ranging pattern of analysis for conceptualizing evaluative properties. Instead, a better alternative can be found in a metaphysical version of the Geachean view that goodness is always attributive and never predicative, namely that goodness is always a matter of relative placement in certain kinds of comparison classes. It is then suggested that the good and the valuable need to be separated from each other and that the latter is a species of the former. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Attributive | |
650 | 4 | |a Buck-passing | |
650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Value | |
650 | 4 | |a Goodness | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 12(2009), 4, Seite 329-343 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2009 |g number:4 |g pages:329-343 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40284302 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9175-5 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033754113 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785695215 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112044100 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#A52DF4B39D36292570253063F61E914946660607 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40284302 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |