A Neo-Kantian foundation of Corporate Social Responsibility
‘Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is conceptualized in many ways. We argue that one cannot be indifferent about the issue of its conceptualization. In terms of methodology, our position is that any conceptual discussion must embed CSR in political theory. With regard to substance, we link up wi...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2009
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2009, Volume: 12, Issue: 2, Pages: 117-136 |
| Further subjects: | B
Public vs private
B Contemporary Neo-Kantian thinking B Political Theory B (Conceptualisation of) corporate social responsibility B Right vs morality B Liberalism B Kant |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785695010 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112044059.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-008-9138-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785695010 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785695010 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dubbink, Wim |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Neo-Kantian foundation of Corporate Social Responsibility |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a ‘Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is conceptualized in many ways. We argue that one cannot be indifferent about the issue of its conceptualization. In terms of methodology, our position is that any conceptual discussion must embed CSR in political theory. With regard to substance, we link up with the discussion on whether CSR must be defined on the basis of a tripartite or a quadripartite division of business responsibilities. We share A.B. Carroll’s intuition that a quadripartite division is called for as a basis to define CSR. However, defending the quadripartite division of business responsibilities requires that the distinctions between economic, legal, ethical and discretionary business responsibilities be made intelligible. Carroll’s account is defective in this respect. We argue that contemporary Neo-Kantian political ethics is able to make sense of these distinctions, because of its specific interpretation of liberalism. Interestingly, from a conventional liberal perspective this interpretation of liberalism is atypical, as it extends public morality beyond the domain of the law. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Political Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Right vs morality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public vs private | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liberalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contemporary Neo-Kantian thinking | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a (Conceptualisation of) corporate social responsibility | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Liedekerke, Luc |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 12(2009), 2, Seite 117-136 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2009 |g number:2 |g pages:117-136 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40284278 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9138-2 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 12 |j 2009 |e 2 |h 117-136 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033753915 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785695010 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044059 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#C335AF7D6401C19DCEB1C141EC177E578F0CC22A | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40284278 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||