The Fictionalist’s Attitude Problem

According to John Mackie, moral talk is representational (the realists go that bit right) but its metaphysical presuppositions are wildly implausible (the non-cognitivists got that bit right). This is the basis of Mackie’s now famous error theory: that moral judgments are cognitively meaningful but...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Oddie, Graham (Συγγραφέας) ; Demetriou, Daniel (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: 2007
Στο/Στη: Ethical theory and moral practice
Έτος: 2007, Τόμος: 10, Τεύχος: 5, Σελίδες: 485-498
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B Moral Realism
B Frege–Geach problem
B Fictionalism
B Cognitivism
B Factualism
B Moral fictionalism
B Expressivism
B Error Theory
B Moral acceptance
B Metaethics
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1785694464
003 DE-627
005 20220112044057.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-007-9080-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785694464 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785694464 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Oddie, Graham  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Fictionalist’s Attitude Problem 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to John Mackie, moral talk is representational (the realists go that bit right) but its metaphysical presuppositions are wildly implausible (the non-cognitivists got that bit right). This is the basis of Mackie’s now famous error theory: that moral judgments are cognitively meaningful but systematically false. Of course, Mackie went on to recommend various substantive moral judgments, and, in the light of his error theory, that has seemed odd to a lot of folk. Richard Joyce has argued that Mackie’s approach can be vindicated by a fictionalist account of moral discourse. And Mark Kalderon has argued that moral fictionalism is attractive quite independently of Mackie’s error-theory. Kalderon argues that the Frege–Geach problem shows that we need moral propositions, but that a fictionalist can and should embrace propositional content together with a non-cognitivist account of acceptance of a moral proposition. Indeed, it is clear that any fictionalist is going to have to postulate more than one kind of acceptance attitude. We argue that this double-approach to acceptance generates a new problem – a descendent of Frege–Geach – which we call the acceptance–transfer problem. Although we develop the problem in the context of Kalderon’s version of non-cognitivist fictionalism, we show that it is not the non-cognitivist aspect of Kalderon’s account that generates the problem. A closely related problem surfaces for the more typical variants of fictionalism according to which accepting a moral proposition is believing some closely related non-moral proposition. Fictionalists of both stripes thus have an attitude problem. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Moral acceptance 
650 4 |a Moral Realism 
650 4 |a Moral fictionalism 
650 4 |a Metaethics 
650 4 |a Frege–Geach problem 
650 4 |a Fictionalism 
650 4 |a Factualism 
650 4 |a Expressivism 
650 4 |a Error Theory 
650 4 |a Cognitivism 
700 1 |a Demetriou, Daniel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 10(2007), 5, Seite 485-498  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:2007  |g number:5  |g pages:485-498 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602544  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-007-9080-8  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033753362 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785694464 
LOK |0 005 20220112044057 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#61BC1587DBFF4066327EBA78801763FA0AA5BE1D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602544 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw