Integrity and Demandingness
I discuss Bernard Williams’ ‘integrity objection’ – his version of the demandingness objection to unreasonably demanding ‘extremist’ moral theories such as consequentialism – and argue that it is best understood as presupposing the internal reasons thesis. However, since the internal reasons thesis...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2007
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2007, Volume: 10, Issue: 3, Pages: 255-265 |
| Further subjects: | B
Non-consequentialism
B Extremism B Paradox of deontology B Value pluralism B Demandingness B Bernard Williams B Autonomy B Consequentialism B Integrity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785694278 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112044057.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-007-9073-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785694278 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785694278 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chappell, Timothy |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Integrity and Demandingness |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a I discuss Bernard Williams’ ‘integrity objection’ – his version of the demandingness objection to unreasonably demanding ‘extremist’ moral theories such as consequentialism – and argue that it is best understood as presupposing the internal reasons thesis. However, since the internal reasons thesis is questionable, so is Williams’ integrity objection. I propose an alternative way of bringing out the unreasonableness of extremism, based on the notion of the agent’s autonomy, and show how an objection to this proposal can be outflanked by a strategy that also outflanks the ‘paradox of deontology.’ | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Value pluralism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Non-consequentialism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Paradox of deontology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consequentialism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Extremism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Demandingness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Integrity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bernard Williams | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 10(2007), 3, Seite 255-265 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2007 |g number:3 |g pages:255-265 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602510 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-007-9073-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 10 |j 2007 |e 3 |h 255-265 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033753176 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785694278 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044057 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#8C919B90C7CCA54495BDA262E48CE8AD652E8146 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602510 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||