Realism, Rational Action, and the Humean Theory of Motivation

Realists about practical reasons agree that judgments regarding reasons are beliefs. They disagree, however, over the question of how such beliefs motivate rational action. Some adopt a Humean conception of motivation, according to which beliefs about reasons must combine with independently existing...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barry, Melissa (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2007
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2007, Volume: 10, Issue: 3, Pages: 231-242
Further subjects:B Humean theory of motivation
B Desire
B Normative Belief
B Belief-desire model
B Realism
B Explanation of rational action
B Reasons
B Anti-Humean theory of motivation
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785694251
003 DE-627
005 20220112044057.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-007-9074-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785694251 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785694251 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Barry, Melissa  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Realism, Rational Action, and the Humean Theory of Motivation 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Realists about practical reasons agree that judgments regarding reasons are beliefs. They disagree, however, over the question of how such beliefs motivate rational action. Some adopt a Humean conception of motivation, according to which beliefs about reasons must combine with independently existing desires in order to motivate rational action; others adopt an anti-Humean view, according to which beliefs can motivate rational action in their own right, either directly or by giving rise to a new desire that in turn motivates the action. I argue that the realist who adopts a Humean model for explaining rational action will have a difficult time giving a plausible account of the role that desire plays in this explanation. I explore four interpretations of this role and argue that none allows a Humean theory to explain rational action as convincingly as an anti-Humean theory does. The first two models, in different ways, make acting on a reason impossible. The third allows this possibility, but only by positing a reason-sensitive desire that itself demands an explanation. The fourth avoids this explanatory challenge only by retreating to an empty form of the Humean view. In contrast, an anti-Humean theory can provide an intuitively plausible explanation of rational action. I conclude that the realist about reasons should adopt an anti-Humean theory to explain rational action. 
650 4 |a Reasons 
650 4 |a Realism 
650 4 |a Normative Belief 
650 4 |a Humean theory of motivation 
650 4 |a Desire 
650 4 |a Explanation of rational action 
650 4 |a Belief-desire model 
650 4 |a Anti-Humean theory of motivation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 10(2007), 3, Seite 231-242  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:2007  |g number:3  |g pages:231-242 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602508  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-007-9074-6  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 403375315X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785694251 
LOK |0 005 20220112044057 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#7C972748AC422538C23CA9D99A6DD9ED2E8F1E51 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40602508 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw