Is A Purely First Person Account Of Human Action Defensible?
There are two perspectives available from which to understand an agent's intention in acting. The first is the perspective of the acting agent: what did she take to be her end, and the means necessary to achieve that end? The other is a third person perspective that is attentive to causal or co...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2006
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2006, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 441-460 |
| Further subjects: | B
Action
B Natural Law B Basic Goods B Intention B double effect |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785693956 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112044056.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-006-9024-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785693956 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785693956 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tollefsen, Christopher |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is A Purely First Person Account Of Human Action Defensible? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a There are two perspectives available from which to understand an agent's intention in acting. The first is the perspective of the acting agent: what did she take to be her end, and the means necessary to achieve that end? The other is a third person perspective that is attentive to causal or conceptual relations: was some causal outcome of the agent's action sufficiently close, or so conceptually related, to what the agent did that it should be considered part of her intention? Recent goods based views in ethics are divided as to whether only the first person perspective, or a mix of both perspectives, are necessary to understand intention and action. But resolution of the issue is necessary if goods based views are to be able to deploy to principle of double effect; for that principle requires an account of how to distinguish what is genuinely a matter of intention in human action from what is not. I argue that the pure first person account is better than the mixed account. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Natural Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a double effect | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Basic Goods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Action | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 9(2006), 4, Seite 441-460 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2006 |g number:4 |g pages:441-460 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504416 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9024-8 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 9 |j 2006 |e 4 |h 441-460 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033752854 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785693956 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112044056 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#16819554E2EA98A258B089064CC596B43ABE7AC9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504416 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Intention |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Intention |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Intención |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Intenzione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 意图,打算,意向 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 意圖,打算,意向 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Intenção |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Намерение |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Πρόθεση |