The Meta-Justification of Reflective Equilibrium
The paper addresses the possibility of providing a meta-justification of what appears to be crucial epistemic desiderata involved in the method of reflective equilibrium. I argue that although the method of reflective equilibrium appears to be widely in use in moral theorising, the prospects of prov...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2006
|
Στο/Στη: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Έτος: 2006, Τόμος: 9, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 131-147 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Reflective Equilibrium
B meta-justification B Coherentism B moral theorising B Foundationalism B moral epistemology |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Σύνοψη: | The paper addresses the possibility of providing a meta-justification of what appears to be crucial epistemic desiderata involved in the method of reflective equilibrium. I argue that although the method of reflective equilibrium appears to be widely in use in moral theorising, the prospects of providing a meta-justification of crucial epistemic desiderata are rather bleak. Nor is the requirement that a meta-justification be provided obviously misguided. In addition, I briefly note some of the implications of these results for our use of the method of reflective equilibrium and for the best interpretation of the method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-005-9006-2 |