Noncognitivism and Wishfulness

It has recently been argued by Cian Dorr that if noncognitivism is true, inferences to factual conclusions from premises at least one of which is moral must be condemned as irrational. For, given a noncognitivist understanding of what it is to accept such premises, such reasoning would be wishful th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lenman, James (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2003
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2003, Volume: 6, Issue: 3, Pages: 265-274
Further subjects:B Noncognitivism
B Cian Dorr
B Irrationality
B normative logic
B Wishful thinking
B Metaethics
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785692798
003 DE-627
005 20220112044051.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1026037820411  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785692798 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785692798 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lenman, James  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Noncognitivism and Wishfulness 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It has recently been argued by Cian Dorr that if noncognitivism is true, inferences to factual conclusions from premises at least one of which is moral must be condemned as irrational. For, given a noncognitivist understanding of what it is to accept such premises, such reasoning would be wishful thinking: irrationally revising our views about the world to make them cohere with our desires and feelings. This he takes to be a reductio of noncognitivism. I argue that no compelling case to this effect has been made out. I show how, in many cases, non-cognitivists can make excellent sense of the rational legitimacy of such arguments. In cases where they plausibly cannot do so, moreover, this legitimacy is highly doubtful for independently plausible reasons and should be doubted even by cognitivists. 
650 4 |a Wishful thinking 
650 4 |a normative logic 
650 4 |a Noncognitivism 
650 4 |a Metaethics 
650 4 |a Irrationality 
650 4 |a Cian Dorr 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 6(2003), 3, Seite 265-274  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2003  |g number:3  |g pages:265-274 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504269  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037820411  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 6  |j 2003  |e 3  |h 265-274 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033751696 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785692798 
LOK |0 005 20220112044051 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#412D00EC2A4C215B20E471760CD709E3BFEC3749 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504269 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw