Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’

This article draws on the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant to explore whether a corporate ‘duty of beneficence’ to non-shareholders is consistent with the orthodox ‘shareholder theory’ of the firm. It examines the ethical framework of Milton Friedman’s argument and asks whether it necessarily rules...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mansell, Samuel (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: 2013
En: Journal of business ethics
Año: 2013, Volumen: 117, Número: 3, Páginas: 583-599
Otras palabras clave:B shareholder theory
B Deontology
B Stakeholder Theory
B Property Rights
B Duty of beneficence
B shareholder activism
B Friedman
B Imperfect duties
B Kant
Acceso en línea: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785672703
003 DE-627
005 20230710121343.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-012-1542-9  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785672703 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785672703 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-012-1542-9-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mansell, Samuel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’ 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article draws on the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant to explore whether a corporate ‘duty of beneficence’ to non-shareholders is consistent with the orthodox ‘shareholder theory’ of the firm. It examines the ethical framework of Milton Friedman’s argument and asks whether it necessarily rules out the well-being of non-shareholders as a corporate objective. The article examines Kant’s distinction between ‘duties of right’ and ‘duties of virtue’ (the latter including the duty of beneficence) and investigates their consistency with the shareholder theory. The article concludes that it is possible within the ethical framework of shareholder theory for managers to pursue directly the happiness of non-shareholders. Furthermore, shareholders have a duty to hold management to account for the moral consequences of the firm’s activities on non-shareholding stakeholders. 
650 4 |a shareholder activism 
650 4 |a Stakeholder Theory 
650 4 |a shareholder theory 
650 4 |a Property Rights 
650 4 |a Imperfect duties 
650 4 |a Kant 
650 4 |a Friedman 
650 4 |a Duty of beneficence 
650 4 |a Deontology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 117(2013), 3, Seite 583-599  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:117  |g year:2013  |g number:3  |g pages:583-599 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001872  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1542-9  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033731601 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785672703 
LOK |0 005 20220112043935 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#A7BBC07FE8B046A025BB09218BCA5779F5625D0F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001872 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw