Creativity or Coercion: Alternative Perspectives on Rights to Intellectual Property
Part one of this paper considers the question of property rights in general and asks how such rights can be justified, contrasting Consequentialist with other approaches and concludes that it is impossible to avoid a broadly Consequentialist approach. Part two considers the question of intellectual...
Опубликовано в: : | Journal of business ethics |
---|---|
Главный автор: | |
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2007
|
В: |
Journal of business ethics
Год: 2007, Том: 71, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 441-455 |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Law and economics
B Utilitarianism B Intellectual Property B Conequentialism B Property Rights |
Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | Part one of this paper considers the question of property rights in general and asks how such rights can be justified, contrasting Consequentialist with other approaches and concludes that it is impossible to avoid a broadly Consequentialist approach. Part two considers the question of intellectual property (IP) and asks how property rights justifications apply to it. The basic economics if IP is indispensable in this discussion. Finally, part three, considers IP in the light of modern technological developments. I conclude that the real dangers lie more in the specific ways government and special interests respond to this technology than from the nature of IP rights themselves. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9150-1 |