Creativity or Coercion: Alternative Perspectives on Rights to Intellectual Property
Part one of this paper considers the question of property rights in general and asks how such rights can be justified, contrasting Consequentialist with other approaches and concludes that it is impossible to avoid a broadly Consequentialist approach. Part two considers the question of intellectual...
Pubblicato in: | Journal of business ethics |
---|---|
Autore principale: | |
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2007
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Anno: 2007, Volume: 71, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 441-455 |
Altre parole chiave: | B
Law and economics
B Utilitarianism B Intellectual Property B Conequentialism B Property Rights |
Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Riepilogo: | Part one of this paper considers the question of property rights in general and asks how such rights can be justified, contrasting Consequentialist with other approaches and concludes that it is impossible to avoid a broadly Consequentialist approach. Part two considers the question of intellectual property (IP) and asks how property rights justifications apply to it. The basic economics if IP is indispensable in this discussion. Finally, part three, considers IP in the light of modern technological developments. I conclude that the real dangers lie more in the specific ways government and special interests respond to this technology than from the nature of IP rights themselves. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9150-1 |