Exploiting Injustice in Mutually Beneficial Market Exchange: The Case of Sweatshop Labor
Mutually beneficial exchanges in markets can be exploitative because one party takes advantage of an underlying injustice. For instance, employers of sweatshop workers are often accused of exploiting the desperate conditions of their employees, although the latter accept the terms of their employmen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer
2019
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 156, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-69 |
| Further subjects: | B
Justice
B Sweatshops B Labor conditions B Fair play B Human Rights B Inequality B Exploitation |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785668854 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230710121329.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-017-3574-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785668854 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785668854 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-017-3574-7-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Miklós, András |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Exploiting Injustice in Mutually Beneficial Market Exchange: The Case of Sweatshop Labor |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Mutually beneficial exchanges in markets can be exploitative because one party takes advantage of an underlying injustice. For instance, employers of sweatshop workers are often accused of exploiting the desperate conditions of their employees, although the latter accept the terms of their employment voluntarily. A weakness of this account of exploitation is its tendency for over-inclusiveness. Certainly, given the prevalence of global and domestic socioeconomic inequalities, not all exchanges that take place against background injustices should be considered exploitative. This paper offers a framework to identify exploitation in mutually beneficial exchange, focusing on the case of sweatshop labor. It argues that an employer can be viewed as taking unfair advantage of an underlying injustice if and only if the employer’s surplus from the exchange in the unjust state of affairs exceeds the surplus it could maximally obtain in a just state of affairs. The paper illustrates the applicability of this framework using three different conceptions of justice and argues that it is superior to microlevel accounts of exploitation that regard background justice as irrelevant. The paper concludes by describing some normative implications that follow from judging an exchange exploitative. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Sweatshops | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Labor conditions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inequality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fairness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Exploitation | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 156(2019), 1, Seite 59-69 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:156 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:59-69 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3574-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033727752 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785668854 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043921 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#0E89DC87ECF451505AC39C4B1A023A5DB4B3EA76 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Fair play |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Équité,Fairplay,impartialité,Fairplay,impartialité |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Justicia,Fairness,Fairness |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Correttezza |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 公平,公正 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 公平,公正 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Justiça,Fairness,Fairness |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Справедливость |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δικαιοσύνη,Fair play,Ευ αγωνίζεσθαι,Ίση μεταχείριση |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Fair play |