Collective Responsibility Gaps

Which kinds of responsibility can we attribute to which kinds of collective, and why? In contrast, which kinds of collective responsibility can we not attribute—which kinds are ‘gappy’? This study provides a framework for answering these questions. It begins by distinguishing between three kinds of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Collins, Stephanie (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2019
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 154, Issue: 4, Pages: 943-954
Further subjects:B Collective agency
B Duty
B Causation
B Collective Responsibility
B Blame
B Responsibility gaps
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785667688
003 DE-627
005 20230710121322.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-018-3890-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785667688 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785667688 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-018-3890-6-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Collins, Stephanie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Collective Responsibility Gaps 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Which kinds of responsibility can we attribute to which kinds of collective, and why? In contrast, which kinds of collective responsibility can we not attribute—which kinds are ‘gappy’? This study provides a framework for answering these questions. It begins by distinguishing between three kinds of collective (diffuse, teleological, and agential) and three kinds of responsibility (causal, moral, and prospective). It then explains how gaps—i.e. cases where we cannot attribute the responsibility we might want to—appear to arise within each type of collective responsibility. It argues some of these gaps do not exist on closer inspection, at least for some collectives and some of the time. 
650 4 |a Duty 
650 4 |a Blame 
650 4 |a Causation 
650 4 |a Responsibility gaps 
650 4 |a Collective agency 
650 4 |a Collective Responsibility 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 154(2019), 4, Seite 943-954  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:154  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g pages:943-954 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-018-3890-6.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3890-6  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033726586 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785667688 
LOK |0 005 20220112043917 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#FC0EBC55DC2AF8C4479FD748E0FBF7E03EFCF813 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw