“Ethical and Legal First Amendment Implications of FBI v. Apple: A Commentary on Etzioni’s ‘Apple: Good Business, Poor Citizen?’”
This commentary proceeds as follows. First, it is argued from both ethical and legal perspectives through an analysis of Court precedents that Etzioni’s has improperly developed a too narrow First Amendment interpretation and conclusion that Apple should comply with the FBI’s demand to provide the F...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2018
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2018, Volume: 151, Issue: 1, Pages: 17-28 |
| Further subjects: | B
National Security
B Business Ethics B Social media |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785665367 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230710121308.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-017-3437-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785665367 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785665367 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-017-3437-2-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nielsen, Richard P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Nielsen, Richard P. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a “Ethical and Legal First Amendment Implications of FBI v. Apple: A Commentary on Etzioni’s ‘Apple: Good Business, Poor Citizen?’” |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This commentary proceeds as follows. First, it is argued from both ethical and legal perspectives through an analysis of Court precedents that Etzioni’s has improperly developed a too narrow First Amendment interpretation and conclusion that Apple should comply with the FBI’s demand to provide the FBI with a key to open iPhones. That is, broad First Amendment considerations and not solely narrow First Amendment “compelled speech” or only Fourth Amendment privacy issues are offered and analyzed from both ethical and legal perspectives. A key point here is that broad First Amendment considerations protect, with exceptions, political and ethical discretion space for “Press” organizations to exercise, or not, ethical responsibilities, including rights to publish or not publish information and opinions, rather than compliance with government orders to publish or not publish. Further, Court cases are discussed from both legal and ethical perspectives where the Courts have established that social media organizations such as Facebook and Twitter do and should have broad First Amendment protection of free expression and peaceful assembly as traditional media such as newspapers have. It is suggested that Apple can and should be considered a social media organization. In addition, special First Amendment protection and limitations concerning national security are analyzed. Second, it is suggested that Etzioni’s point that Apple protected its clients soley for “business profitability” reasons is also a too narrow interpretation since there are more complex, mixed, and combined ethical and political-economic reasons for protecting clients and First Amendment protections. Third, the philosopher Paul Ricoeur’s ethics process responsibility framework concerning relationships between ethics and law and the need for an ethics responsibility rather than a compliance approach, which is similar to Brandeis’ legal ethics approach, is compared with and offered as an alternative to Etzioni’s compliance based “Liberal communitarian” approach. It is suggested that the difference between the Rocoeur and Etzioni approaches is similar to the difference between compliance and ethics responsibility process programs in organizations. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a National Security | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Media | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Business Ethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 151(2018), 1, Seite 17-28 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:151 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:17-28 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3437-2 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033724265 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785665367 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043909 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#2DA3B6F693132AA03648453F32ECFAE6BE238A06 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 12-01-22 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Social media,Social media |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Réseaux sociaux,Médias sociaux |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Media social |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Social media |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 虚拟小区,计算机社群,电子社群 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 虛擬社區,電腦社群,電子社群 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Mídia social |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Социальные медиа |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης,Social media |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Soziale Medien |
