Sweatshops: Economic Analysis and Exploitation as Unfairness
The economic and moral defense of sweatshops given by Powell and Zwolinski (J Bus Ethics 107:449–472, 2012) has been criticized in two recent papers. Coakley and Kates (J Bus Ethics 117:553–558, 2013) focus on putative weaknesses in the logic of Powell’s and Zwolinski’s argument. Preiss (Bus Ethics...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2018
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Jahr: 2018, Band: 149, Heft: 1, Seiten: 15-29 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Sweatshops
B Economic Analysis B Minimum Wage B Fairness B Exploitation |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785664239 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250324051131.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-016-3091-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785664239 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785664239 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-016-3091-0-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sollars, Gordon G. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sweatshops: Economic Analysis and Exploitation as Unfairness |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The economic and moral defense of sweatshops given by Powell and Zwolinski (J Bus Ethics 107:449–472, 2012) has been criticized in two recent papers. Coakley and Kates (J Bus Ethics 117:553–558, 2013) focus on putative weaknesses in the logic of Powell’s and Zwolinski’s argument. Preiss (Bus Ethics Quart 24(1):55–82, 2014) argues that, even granting the validity of their economic argument, Powell’s and Zwolinski’s defense is without force when viewed from a Kantian republican viewpoint. We are concerned that sweatshop critics have misinterpreted the economic literature and overstated the conclusions that follow from their ethical premises. We show that the best understanding of the current economic literature supports Powell’s and Zwolinski’s conclusions about the negative effects of sweatshop wage regulation, and that it is unreasonable to reject economic analysis in moral argument against sweatshops even from a Kantian perspective. Additionally, we defend the theory of exploitation as unfairness given by Wertheimer (Exploitation, 1996), and show how economic analysis can be applied to that theory to identify cases of sweatshop exploitation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Sweatshops | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Minimum Wage | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fairness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Exploitation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic Analysis | |
| 700 | 1 | |8 1\p |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)170124460 |0 (DE-627)060161302 |0 (DE-576)131033506 |4 aut |a Englander, Frederick Jay | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 149(2018), 1, Seite 15-29 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:149 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:15-29 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3091-0 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 883 | |8 1 |a cgwrk |d 20250301 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033723137 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785664239 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043906 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#25124575A508AEB8D2EDDF08D82CB965AEDC54AB | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Fair play |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Équité,Fairplay,impartialité,Fairplay,impartialité |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Justicia,Fairness,Fairness |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Correttezza |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 公平,公正 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 公平,公正 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Justiça,Fairness,Fairness |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Справедливость |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δικαιοσύνη,Fair play,Ευ αγωνίζεσθαι,Ίση μεταχείριση |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Fair play |
