Strong Reciprocity in Consumer Boycotts
Boycotts are among the most frequent forms of consumer expression against unethical or egregious acts by firms. Most current research explains consumers’ decisions to participate in a boycott using a universal cost-benefit model that mixes instrumental and expressive motives. To date, no conceptual...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2017
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 145, Issue: 3, Pages: 509-524 |
| Further subjects: | B
Behavioral motives
B Strong reciprocity B Motivational heterogeneity B Consumer boycotts |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785662473 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250324050955.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-015-2870-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785662473 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785662473 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-015-2870-3-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |8 1\p |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1147985790 |0 (DE-627)1007475803 |0 (DE-576)496123246 |4 aut |a Hahn, Tobias | |
| 109 | |a Hahn, Tobias | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Strong Reciprocity in Consumer Boycotts |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Boycotts are among the most frequent forms of consumer expression against unethical or egregious acts by firms. Most current research explains consumers’ decisions to participate in a boycott using a universal cost-benefit model that mixes instrumental and expressive motives. To date, no conceptual framework accounts for the distinct behavioral motives for boycotting though. This article focuses on motivational heterogeneity among consumers. By distinguishing two stable behavioral models—a self-regarding type and a strongly reciprocal type—we introduce the notion of strong reciprocity to the boycott literature. We argue that the presence of strongly reciprocal consumers can enhance boycott success. First, in interactions with the target firm, strongly reciprocal consumers perceive higher levels of egregiousness and are more willing to engage in boycotting behavior, even in unfavorable strategic conditions, which provides a stable basis for boycotting. Second, in interactions with self-regarding consumers, strongly reciprocal consumers are willing to sanction those others, according to whether they participate in the boycott, which increases overall participation in and the likelihood of success of a consumer boycott. These findings have implications for further research, as well as for firms, nongovernmental organizations, and boycotters. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Motivational heterogeneity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Behavioral motives | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Strong reciprocity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consumer boycotts | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Albert, Noël |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 145(2017), 3, Seite 509-524 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:145 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:509-524 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/45022277 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2870-3 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 883 | |8 1 |a cgwrk |d 20250301 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033721371 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785662473 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043900 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#4BD88C630542BF1547E8105E65BE6BA0806BF7F5 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/45022277 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
