Does the Business Case Matter? The Effect of a Perceived Business Case on Small Firms’ Social Engagement

The business case for social responsibility (BCSR) is one of the most widely studied topics in the business and society literature that focuses on large firms. This attention is understandable because large firms have an obligation to shareholders who, as commonly assumed, seek to maximize returns o...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Authors: Panwar, Rajat (Author) ; Nybakk, Erlend (Author) ; Hansen, Eric 1968- (Author) ; Pinkse, Jonatan (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2017
Em: Journal of business ethics
Ano: 2017, Volume: 144, Número: 3, Páginas: 597-608
Outras palavras-chave:B CSR
B Tangible intangible benefits
B social engagement
B Slack resources
B Small firms
B Business Case
Acesso em linha: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785662015
003 DE-627
005 20250324050925.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-015-2835-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785662015 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785662015 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-015-2835-6-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1081788879  |0 (DE-627)846665441  |0 (DE-576)454790872  |4 aut  |a Panwar, Rajat 
109 |a Panwar, Rajat 
245 1 0 |a Does the Business Case Matter? The Effect of a Perceived Business Case on Small Firms’ Social Engagement 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The business case for social responsibility (BCSR) is one of the most widely studied topics in the business and society literature that focuses on large firms. This attention is understandable because large firms have an obligation to shareholders who, as commonly assumed, seek to maximize returns on their investments, in turn, pressing corporate managers to show that firms’ expenditures in social engagement would pay off. Small firms, on the other hand, rarely face such pressures, yet the BCSR logic is increasingly applied to small firms as well. Our primary objective in this paper is to examine whether and how much do small firm owners’ perceptions of BCSR affect the firm’s social engagement. In finding a fine-grained answer to those questions, we consider BCSR as a two-dimensional construct consisting of tangible and intangible benefits, and also integrate the BCSR perspective with the slack resource perspective to offer a motivation-capacity lens to examine firm’s social engagement. Drawing on a multi-industry sample of 478 small firms in the US, we find that while small firm owners’ perceptions about potential tangible benefits of social engagement are not related to the firm’s social engagement, perceptions about potential intangible are positively related. Firm's financial performance is also positively related to its social engagement, but there is no interaction between potential benefits and financial performance. This study contributes to an improved understanding about small firms’ social engagement, which still remains an understudied area. Our results are in line with studies which argue that firms’ social engagement is a response to institutional factors. 
650 4 |a Tangible intangible benefits 
650 4 |a social engagement 
650 4 |a Slack resources 
650 4 |a Small firms 
650 4 |a CSR 
650 4 |a Business Case 
700 1 |a Nybakk, Erlend  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |8 2\p  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1046307398  |0 (DE-627)776072889  |0 (DE-576)399622268  |4 aut  |a Hansen, Eric  |d 1968- 
700 1 |a Pinkse, Jonatan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 144(2017), 3, Seite 597-608  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:144  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:597-608 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/45022191  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2835-6  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
883 |8 1\p  |a cgwrk  |d 20250301  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
883 |8 2\p  |a cgwrk  |d 20250301  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 403372091X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785662015 
LOK |0 005 20220112043858 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#D3633958E9A6ED93B09DBEE442D937F4CCB55896 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/45022191 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw