The Link Between Social Movements and Corporate Social Initiatives: Toward a Multi-level Theory
This article offers a first step toward a multi-level theory linking social movements to corporate social initiatives. In particular, building on the premise that social movements reflect ideologies that direct behavior inside and outside organizations, this essay identifies mechanisms by which soci...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Springer
2017
|
Em: |
Journal of business ethics
Ano: 2017, Volume: 142, Número: 4, Páginas: 735-751 |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Activism
B Stakeholder Theory B Multi-level theory B Ideology B Social Movements B Responsabilidade social da empresa |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Resumo: | This article offers a first step toward a multi-level theory linking social movements to corporate social initiatives. In particular, building on the premise that social movements reflect ideologies that direct behavior inside and outside organizations, this essay identifies mechanisms by which social movements induce firms to engage with social issues. First, social movements are able to influence the expectations that key stakeholders have about firms’ social responsibility, making corporate social initiatives more attractive. Second, through conflict or collaboration, they shape firms’ reputation and legitimacy. And third, social movements’ ideologies manifest inside the corporations by triggering organizational members’ values and affecting managerial cognition. The essay contributes to the literatures on social movements and CSR, extends the understanding of how ideologies are manifested in movement-business interactions, and generates rich opportunities for future research. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3111-0 |