Accounting Professionals’ Ethical Judgment and the Institutional Disciplinary Context: A French–US Comparison
This paper investigates whether accounting professionals’ ethical judgment (EJ) is influenced by the disciplinary system established by the accounting profession in France and the United States. Our study first attempts to determine whether there is a link between the EJ of accounting professionals...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer
2016
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 139, Issue: 4, Pages: 639-659 |
Further subjects: | B
Accounting ethics
B Cross-national study B Disciplinary system B Ethical Judgment B Accounting professionals |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785659650 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230710121235.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-015-2876-x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785659650 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785659650 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-015-2876-x-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Baïada-Hirèche, Loréa |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Accounting Professionals’ Ethical Judgment and the Institutional Disciplinary Context: A French–US Comparison |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper investigates whether accounting professionals’ ethical judgment (EJ) is influenced by the disciplinary system established by the accounting profession in France and the United States. Our study first attempts to determine whether there is a link between the EJ of accounting professionals and the disciplinary context, in each country. It then performs a comparative analysis of the two nations. Our findings indicate that the judgment of American accounting professionals is correlated with the disciplinary decisions of the accountancy board. By contrast, the judgment of French accounting professionals is independent of the disciplinary context. Whereas cross-national studies have thus far attributed differences among nations mainly to cultural distance, current research shows that non-cultural national factors should also be considered. In line with this perspective, our study suggests that institutional factors, in particular the disciplinary system, may also account for the differences between French and American accounting professionals’ ethical perceptions. We support these results by highlighting some characteristics of the countries’ respective legal systems (such as the ease of the procedure, the publication and the impact of sanctions and the format of the rules), which may explain the divergences observed. We conclude by identifying implications for the independence of accounting professionals’ EJ and the risks associated with dissuasive disciplinary systems. | ||
601 | |a Institution | ||
650 | 4 | |a Cross-national study | |
650 | 4 | |a Disciplinary system | |
650 | 4 | |a Accounting professionals | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethical Judgment | |
650 | 4 | |a Accounting ethics | |
700 | 1 | |a Garmilis, Ghislaine |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 139(2016), 4, Seite 639-659 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:139 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:639-659 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/44164249 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2876-x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033718559 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785659650 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112043850 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#7E48F79C4E2F07BC3DA2B8235C917D5458CFFCB0 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/44164249 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |