Behavioral Ethics: A Critique and a Proposal

In behavioral ethics today, there is debate as to which theory of moral development is the best for understanding ethical decision making, thereby facilitating ethical behavior. This debate between behavioral ethicists has been profoundly influenced by the field of moral psychology. Unfortunately, i...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Ellertson, Carol Frogley (Author) ; Ingerson, Marc-Charles (Author) ; Williams, Richard N. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2016
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 138, Issue: 1, Pages: 145-159
Further subjects:B Moral Development
B Behavioral ethics
B Moral judgment–moral action gap
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785658883
003 DE-627
005 20230331053611.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-015-2628-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785658883 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785658883 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-015-2628-y-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ellertson, Carol Frogley  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Ellertson, Carol Frogley  |a Frogley Ellertson, Carol 
245 1 0 |a Behavioral Ethics: A Critique and a Proposal 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In behavioral ethics today, there is debate as to which theory of moral development is the best for understanding ethical decision making, thereby facilitating ethical behavior. This debate between behavioral ethicists has been profoundly influenced by the field of moral psychology. Unfortunately, in the course of this marriage between moral psychology and business ethics and subsequent internal debate, a simple but critical understanding of human being in the field of management has been obscured; i.e., that morality is not a secondary phenomenon arising out of something else. Therefore, in this paper, we will argue that there is a need in behavioral ethics to shift our understanding away from the influence of contemporary moral psychology and back to management theorist Ghoshal’s (Acad Manag Learn Educ 4(1):75–91, 2005) view of what it means to be human in which the moral is fundamental. To assist in this labor, we will build on the philosophical work of Emmanuel Levinas who sees ethics, regardless of the setting, as a metaphysical concern. What this means is that Levinas sees the essential moral character of human life and the reality of human agency as ontologically fundamental, or constitutive of human nature itself. In other words, the ethical is the “first cause” in regard to understanding the nature and action of the individual, including within organizations. Thus, morality in any sphere of human endeavor, including in business, is not merely epiphenomenal to some more fundamental reality. 
650 4 |a Moral judgment–moral action gap 
650 4 |a Moral Development 
650 4 |a Behavioral ethics 
700 1 |a Ingerson, Marc-Charles  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Williams, Richard N.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 138(2016), 1, Seite 145-159  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:138  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:145-159 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24755821  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2628-y  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 138  |j 2016  |e 1  |h 145-159 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033717781 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785658883 
LOK |0 005 20220112043846 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#8AF597B1AFFC4B0F110CDD029445CF1DAFC075D8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24755821 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw