Approving or Improving Research Ethics in Management Journals

Despite significant scholarly debate about knowledge production in the management discipline through the peer-review journal processes, there is minimal discussion about the ethical treatment of the research subject in these publication processes. In contrast, the ethical scrutiny of management rese...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Greenwood, Michelle (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2016
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2016, 卷: 137, 發布: 3, Pages: 507-520
Further subjects:B ethics committees
B Research training
B publication ethics
B Academic ethics
B human subjects
B research ethics
B Research education
在線閱讀: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785658603
003 DE-627
005 20230331053609.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-015-2564-x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785658603 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785658603 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-015-2564-x-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Greenwood, Michelle  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Approving or Improving Research Ethics in Management Journals 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Despite significant scholarly debate about knowledge production in the management discipline through the peer-review journal processes, there is minimal discussion about the ethical treatment of the research subject in these publication processes. In contrast, the ethical scrutiny of management research processes within research institutions is often highly formalized and very focused on the protection of research participants. Hence, the question arises of how management publication processes should best account for the interests of the research subject, both in the narrow sense of specific research participants and in the broader understanding of the subject of the research. This question is particularly pertinent in light of significant codification of research ethics within academic institutions, and increasing self-reflection within the management discipline about the “good” of management research and education. Findings from a survey and interviews with management journal editors (and others involved in journal publication) reveal a complex scenario; many editors believe that a formalized requirement within the journal publication process may have detrimental outcomes and, in fact, diminish the ethical integrity of management scholarship. Building on these findings, this paper argues that ethical concern for the research subject merely in terms of institutional rule compliance and avoidance of harm to individual participants is insufficient, and calls for explicitly positive engagement with both the individual and the collective subject of management research should receive due ethical consideration. An alternative model involving reflexive ethical consideration of research subjects across the publication process—with implications for role of authors, reviewers, editors, and research subjects—is outlined. 
650 4 |a Research training 
650 4 |a Research education 
650 4 |a ethics committees 
650 4 |a human subjects 
650 4 |a Academic ethics 
650 4 |a publication ethics 
650 4 |a research ethics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 137(2016), 3, Seite 507-520  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:137  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g pages:507-520 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24755762  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2564-x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 137  |j 2016  |e 3  |h 507-520 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033717501 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785658603 
LOK |0 005 20220112043845 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#1E5421792DC4AB8AF2FDA3149897C9B95D3096E9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24755762 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw