Susceptibility to the ‘Dark Side’ of Goal-Setting: Does Moral Justification Influence the Effect of Goals on Unethical Behavior?

Setting goals in the workplace can motivate improved performance but it might also compromise ethical behavior. In this paper, we propose that individual differences in the dispositional tendency to morally justify behavior moderate the effects of specific performance goals on unethical behavior. We...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Niven, Karen (Автор) ; Healy, Colm (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2016
В: Journal of business ethics
Год: 2016, Том: 137, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 115-127
Другие ключевые слова:B Moral Justification
B Ethics
B Cheating
B Goal
B Goal-setting
B Deception
B Unethical Behavior
Online-ссылка: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785658360
003 DE-627
005 20230710121228.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-015-2545-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785658360 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785658360 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-015-2545-0-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Niven, Karen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Susceptibility to the ‘Dark Side’ of Goal-Setting: Does Moral Justification Influence the Effect of Goals on Unethical Behavior? 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Setting goals in the workplace can motivate improved performance but it might also compromise ethical behavior. In this paper, we propose that individual differences in the dispositional tendency to morally justify behavior moderate the effects of specific performance goals on unethical behavior. We conducted an experimental study in which working participants, who were randomly assigned to a specific goal condition or to a condition with a vague goal that lacked a specific target (i.e., ‘do your best’), completed two tasks in which they had the opportunity to act unethically. In an ethical dilemma task, participants in the specific goal condition were more likely to advocate using unethical methods. However, in an anagram task, only those with high moral justification overstated their performance to a greater degree in the specific goal condition. As such, individuals may not be equally susceptible to the ‘dark side’ of goal-setting. 
601 |a Influencer 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Moral Justification 
650 4 |a Deception 
650 4 |a Cheating 
650 4 |a Unethical Behavior 
650 4 |a Goal 
650 4 |a Goal-setting 
700 1 |a Healy, Colm  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 137(2016), 1, Seite 115-127  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:137  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:115-127 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24755750  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2545-0  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033717269 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785658360 
LOK |0 005 20220112043844 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#9221D8CF98353231CDA98EBDB57C8A166333CCDC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24755750 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SYE 0 0 |a The Ethics