Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives
As forms of private self-regulation, multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have emerged as an important empirical phenomenon in global governance processes. At the same time, MSIs are also theoretically intriguing because of their inherent double nature. On the one hand, MSIs spell out CSR standards...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer
2016
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 135, Issue: 2, Pages: 341-360 |
| Further subjects: | B
Institutional Theory
B Multi-stakeholder initiatives B Business self-regulation B Global governance B Management of diverse interests B Soft Law B institutional entrepreneurship B Club theory B Political role of the firm |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785657518 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230710121224.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2468-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785657518 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785657518 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-014-2468-1-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zeyen, Anica |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a As forms of private self-regulation, multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have emerged as an important empirical phenomenon in global governance processes. At the same time, MSIs are also theoretically intriguing because of their inherent double nature. On the one hand, MSIs spell out CSR standards that define norms for corporate behavior. On the other hand, MSIs are also the result of corporate and stakeholder behavior. We combine the perspectives of institutional theory and club theory to conceptualize this double nature of MSIs. Based on a stage model that looks at the interplay of actor and institutional dynamics, we generate insights into why actors join a voluntary MSI, how the various motivations and intentions of the actors influence the standard development, and how these as well as the MSI design are subsequently influenced by both external (institutional) and internal (club) dynamics. | ||
| 601 | |a Institution | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a institutional entrepreneurship | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Institutional Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Club theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Soft Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political role of the firm | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Multi-stakeholder initiatives | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Management of diverse interests | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Global Governance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Business self-regulation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Beckmann, Markus |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wolters, Stella |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 135(2016), 2, Seite 341-360 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:135 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:341-360 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24736086 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2468-1 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033716416 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785657518 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043841 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#1951AD6BCA934C7E4C79978ACFC680ED02FE91CA | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24736086 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Global governance |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Gouvernance mondiale |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Gobierno global |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Governance globale |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 全球治理,全球管治 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 全球治理,全球管治 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Governança global |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Глобальное управление |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Παγκόσμια διακυβέρνηση |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Globalisierung |