Royal Dutch Shell in Nigeria: Where Do Responsibilities End?

This case study discusses the scope of responsibilities and the basis of legitimacy of multinational corporations (MNC) in a complex operating environment. In January 2013 a precedent was set when Shell was held liable in The Hague for oil pollution in the Niger Delta. The landmark ruling climaxed t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hennchen, Esther (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2015
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 129, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-25
Further subjects:B Corporate social responsibility
B Public responsibility deficit
B Sustainability
B Corporate legitimacy
B Political role of multinational companies
B Public responsibility strategy
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785654357
003 DE-627
005 20230331053510.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-014-2142-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785654357 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785654357 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-014-2142-7-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hennchen, Esther  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Royal Dutch Shell in Nigeria: Where Do Responsibilities End? 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This case study discusses the scope of responsibilities and the basis of legitimacy of multinational corporations (MNC) in a complex operating environment. In January 2013 a precedent was set when Shell was held liable in The Hague for oil pollution in the Niger Delta. The landmark ruling climaxed the ongoing dispute over the scope of Shell’s responsibilities for both the company’s positive and negative impact. Shell’s was considered a forerunner in corporate social responsibility and had even assumed public responsibilities in a context of a public responsibility void. However, the company remained a regular target of civil society activism and legal proceedings concerned with malpractice. The court case attracted international attention for its novelty and increasing media and civil society pressure required immediate action. How can Shell respond to this negative publicity to keep its license to operate? What is the scope of the company’s responsibilities in such a controversial human rights context? Students are expected to discuss these questions going beyond a simple moralistic or liability thinking. They are encouraged to take into account the complex structural processes that connect persons and institutions in very different social and geographical positions. The experiences of Shell are an excellent case in point since attention is drawn to the background conditions of globally operating companies, in which the isolation of perpetrators based on causality is not realistic. The case also reveals the particular challenges, which MNCs face in the context of increasing demands to take on public responsibilities while respecting their economic mandate. 
601 |a Nigeria 
650 4 |a Sustainability 
650 4 |a Public responsibility strategy 
650 4 |a Public responsibility deficit 
650 4 |a Political role of multinational companies 
650 4 |a Corporate Social Responsibility 
650 4 |a Corporate legitimacy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 129(2015), 1, Seite 1-25  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:129  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:1-25 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24702884  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2142-7  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 129  |j 2015  |e 1  |h 1-25 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033713247 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785654357 
LOK |0 005 20220112043825 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#E270D4AE4294C57005FB18CE58F4C9C1A86D3EC0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24702884 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility 
STB 0 0 |a Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise 
STC 0 0 |a Responsabilidad social de la empresa 
STD 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility,Responsabilità sociale d'impresa,Responsabilità sociale d'impresa 
STF 0 0 |a 企業社會責任 
STG 0 0 |a Responsabilidade social da empresa 
STH 0 0 |a Корпоративная социальная ответственность 
STI 0 0 |a Εταιρική κοινωνική ευθύνη,Corporate social responsibility 
SYE 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility,Corporate citizenship,Corporate environment responsibility,Corporate environmental responsibility,Corporate responsibility,Corporate sustainability management,Corporate volunteering,CSR (Corporate social responsibility),Environmental social governance,ESG,Gesellschaftliche Unternehmensverantwortung,Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen,Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen,Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement,Soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen,Soziales Engagement von Unternehmen,Unternehmensverantwortung,Unternehmerische Sozialverantwortung,CSR,Corporate Citizenship,Unternehmerische Gesellschaftsverantwortung,Unternehmerische Sozialverantwortung,Unternehmen