One Justice or Two? A Model of Reconciliation of Normative Justice Theories and Empirical Research on Organizational Justice
Management scholars and social scientists investigate dynamics of subjective fairness perceptions in the workplace under the umbrella term “organizational justice.” Philosophers and ethicists, on the other hand, think of justice as a normative requirement in societal relationships with conflicting i...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2014
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 124, Issue: 3, Pages: 435-451 |
| Further subjects: | B
Separation Thesis
B Normative justice B Fair play B Justice theories B Organizational Justice |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 178565215X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230331053441.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-013-1881-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)178565215X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP178565215X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-013-1881-1-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cugueró-Escofet, Natàlia |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a One Justice or Two? A Model of Reconciliation of Normative Justice Theories and Empirical Research on Organizational Justice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Management scholars and social scientists investigate dynamics of subjective fairness perceptions in the workplace under the umbrella term “organizational justice.” Philosophers and ethicists, on the other hand, think of justice as a normative requirement in societal relationships with conflicting interests. Both ways of looking at justice have neither remained fully separated nor been clearly integrated. It seems that much could be gained and learned by more closely integrating the ethical and the empirical fields of justice. On the other hand, it may simply not be possible to bridge the divide between the subjective empirical and the normative prescriptive justice as both fields pose different questions and rely on different assumptions and methods. In this paper, we propose a “reconciliation” model, as a third way of considering justice in the workplace, taking into account normative and psychological issues pertaining to justice. Through applying a reconciliation model, we provide a new way of looking at the interconnections between justice philosophy and organizational justice that could advance future research in both fields. Our model also implies that justice researchers can and should be concerned with the moral implications of their own subject of research. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Normative justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Separation Thesis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fairness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justice theories | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Organizational Justice | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fortin, Marion |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 124(2014), 3, Seite 435-451 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:124 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g pages:435-451 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24033281 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1881-1 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 124 |j 2014 |e 3 |h 435-451 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 403371104X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 178565215X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043817 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#0E3713AB3E2171DC8C56C3C58258AAF028AB2488 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24033281 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Fair play |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Équité,Fairplay,impartialité,Fairplay,impartialité |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Justicia,Fairness,Fairness |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Correttezza |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 公平,公正 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 公平,公正 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Justiça,Fairness,Fairness |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Справедливость |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δικαιοσύνη,Fair play,Ευ αγωνίζεσθαι,Ίση μεταχείριση |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Fair play |