Fixing the Game? Legitimacy, Morality Policy and Research in Gambling

It is a truism that some industries are controversial either because the processes employed or the resulting products, for instance, can potentially harm the well-being of people. The controversy that surrounds certain industries can sharply polarise public opinion and debate. In this article, we em...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Miller, Rohan (Author) ; Michelson, Grant (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2013
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2013, Volume: 116, Issue: 3, Pages: 601-614
Further subjects:B Electronic gambling
B Corporate social responsibility
B Legitimacy theory
B Stakeholders
B Morality policy
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785648667
003 DE-627
005 20230710121138.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-012-1487-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785648667 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785648667 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-012-1487-z-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Miller, Rohan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Fixing the Game? Legitimacy, Morality Policy and Research in Gambling 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is a truism that some industries are controversial either because the processes employed or the resulting products, for instance, can potentially harm the well-being of people. The controversy that surrounds certain industries can sharply polarise public opinion and debate. In this article, we employ legitimacy theory and morality policy to show how one industry sector (the electronic gaming machine sector as part of the wider gambling industry) is subject to this reaction. We suggest that the difficulty in establishing legitimacy surrounding CSR practices in this sector is related to morality policy, whereby ideology and personal values play important roles in dividing opinion. Thus, gambling is often framed as an activity that is morally and ethically problematic. To show how this can manifest, we examine the veracity of two state-funded studies in Australia used in the development of gambling policy and their subsequent adoption in academic research. We highlight methodological, analytical and reporting issues in these studies that normally should be identified by those using such findings. The significance is that when morality policy and conflict surrounding legitimacy are involved, then it can explain why adherence to normative research standards is potentially lowered. Our theoretical posture leads us to further speculate that the adoption and communication of CSR in electronic gambling will be contested by opponents of the industry. 
650 4 |a Corporate Social Responsibility 
650 4 |a Morality policy 
650 4 |a Legitimacy theory 
650 4 |a Electronic gambling 
650 4 |a Stakeholders 
700 1 |a Michelson, Grant  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 116(2013), 3, Seite 601-614  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:116  |g year:2013  |g number:3  |g pages:601-614 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001944  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1487-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033707557 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785648667 
LOK |0 005 20220112043803 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#37B3BE14669D473461267B6BD2E960384D584B4B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001944 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility 
STB 0 0 |a Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise 
STC 0 0 |a Responsabilidad social de la empresa 
STD 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility,Responsabilità sociale d'impresa,Responsabilità sociale d'impresa 
STF 0 0 |a 企業社會責任 
STG 0 0 |a Responsabilidade social da empresa 
STH 0 0 |a Корпоративная социальная ответственность 
STI 0 0 |a Εταιρική κοινωνική ευθύνη,Corporate social responsibility 
SYE 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility,Corporate citizenship,Corporate environment responsibility,Corporate environmental responsibility,Corporate responsibility,Corporate sustainability management,Corporate volunteering,CSR (Corporate social responsibility),Environmental social governance,ESG,Gesellschaftliche Unternehmensverantwortung,Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen,Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen,Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement,Soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen,Soziales Engagement von Unternehmen,Unternehmensverantwortung,Unternehmerische Sozialverantwortung,CSR,Corporate Citizenship,Unternehmerische Gesellschaftsverantwortung,Unternehmerische Sozialverantwortung,Unternehmen