When and Why Usury Should be Prohibited

Usury ceilings seem indefensible. Their opponents insist these caps harm the consumers they are intended to help. Low ceilings are said to prevent the least advantaged agents from accessing legal credit and drive them into the black market, where prices are higher and collection methods are harsher....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mayer, Robert (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2013, Volume: 116, Issue: 3, Pages: 513-527
Further subjects:B payday lending
B Just price
B Interest Rate
B Credit
B Loan shark
B Usury
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785648616
003 DE-627
005 20230710121138.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-012-1483-3  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785648616 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785648616 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-012-1483-3-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mayer, Robert  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Mayer, Robert 
245 1 0 |a When and Why Usury Should be Prohibited 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Usury ceilings seem indefensible. Their opponents insist these caps harm the consumers they are intended to help. Low ceilings are said to prevent the least advantaged agents from accessing legal credit and drive them into the black market, where prices are higher and collection methods are harsher. But in this paper, I challenge these arguments and show that the benefits of interest-rate limitations in the most expensive credit markets clearly outweigh the costs. The test case is payday lending. Deregulated pricing in this market produces negative externalities that justify usury restrictions. Unless prices are capped, the more solvent majority of borrowers is compelled to cross-subsidize the least solvent debtors, who have a high rate of default. Rationing the riskiest debtors out of this market by means of a moderate usury cap puts an end to this unfairness and produces fewer bad consequences than the advocates of deregulated pricing recognize. I argue that only an extreme principle like maximizing the minimum could justify a free market in payday credit. 
601 |a Prohibition 
650 4 |a Usury 
650 4 |a payday lending 
650 4 |a Loan shark 
650 4 |a Just price 
650 4 |a Interest Rate 
650 4 |a Credit 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 116(2013), 3, Seite 513-527  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:116  |g year:2013  |g number:3  |g pages:513-527 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001939  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1483-3  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033707506 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785648616 
LOK |0 005 20220112043803 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#C30EAE33EF9C1594A467FD979CCEA3AB04ED85DC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001939 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw