Culture and Consumer Ethics

Disparity in consumer ethics reflects cultural variations; these are differences in the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes one culture from another. This study explores the differences in consumer ethics across cultural dimensions using Hofstede’s (in Culture’s consequences: inter...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Swaidan, Ziad (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2012
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 108, Issue: 2, Pages: 201-213
Further subjects:B Muncy and Vitell model
B Hofstede model
B African American subculture
B Consumer ethics
B Culture
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785645072
003 DE-627
005 20230710121119.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-011-1070-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785645072 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785645072 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-011-1070-z-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Swaidan, Ziad  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Culture and Consumer Ethics 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Disparity in consumer ethics reflects cultural variations; these are differences in the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes one culture from another. This study explores the differences in consumer ethics across cultural dimensions using Hofstede’s (in Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values, Sage, Beverly Hills, 1980) model (collectivism, masculinity, power distance, and uncertainty avoidance) and Muncy and Vitell (in J Bus Res 24(4):297–311, 1992) consumer ethics model (i.e., illegal, active, passive, and no harm). This is the first study to empirically explore consumer ethics using these two major constructs. Seven hundred sixty one African American consumers were used to test the four major hypotheses developed in this study. Current research has revealed that there are significant differences in ethics between consumers who score high and consumers who score low on Hofstede’s four cultural dimensions. In general, this research revealed that consumers who score high on collectivism, high on uncertainty avoidance, low on masculinity, and low on power distance scales reject questionable activities more than consumers who score low on collectivism, low on uncertainty avoidance, high on masculinity, and high on power distance. This study should prove valuable to international marketers because the Hofstede cultural model allows managers to identify differences in consumer ethics across different cultures and thus provides a theoretical base for designing effective marketing strategies. 
650 4 |a Muncy and Vitell model 
650 4 |a African American subculture 
650 4 |a Consumer ethics 
650 4 |a Hofstede model 
650 4 |a Culture 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 108(2012), 2, Seite 201-213  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:108  |g year:2012  |g number:2  |g pages:201-213 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476287  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1070-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033703950 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785645072 
LOK |0 005 20220112043748 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#FEB87BD15968D0E96FD816C93B2113F847A9F0D6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476287 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw