The Continuing Continuum Problem of Deposits and Loans

Barnett and Block (J Bus Ethics 18(2):179–194, 2011) argue that one cannot distinguish between deposits and loans due to the continuum problem of maturities and because future goods do not exist—both essential characteristics that distinguish deposit from loan contracts. In a similar way but leading...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Bagus, Philipp (Author) ; Howden, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2012
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 106, Issue: 3, Pages: 295-300
Further subjects:B continuum problem
B Fractional reserves
B Natural Law
B Banking
B Loans and deposits
B Claims to future goods
B Maturity mismatching
B Fraud
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785644378
003 DE-627
005 20230331053225.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-011-0996-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785644378 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785644378 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-011-0996-5-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bagus, Philipp  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Continuing Continuum Problem of Deposits and Loans 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Barnett and Block (J Bus Ethics 18(2):179–194, 2011) argue that one cannot distinguish between deposits and loans due to the continuum problem of maturities and because future goods do not exist—both essential characteristics that distinguish deposit from loan contracts. In a similar way but leading to opposite conclusions (Cachanosky, forthcoming) maintains that both maturity mismatching and fractional reserve banking are ethically justified as these contracts are equivalent. We argue herein that the economic and legal differences between genuine deposit and loan contracts are clear. This implies different legal obligations for these contracts, a necessary step in assessing the ethics of both fractional reserve banking and maturity mismatching. While the former is economically, legally, and perhaps most importantly ethically problematic, there are no such troubles with the latter. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Claims to future goods 
650 4 |a continuum problem 
650 4 |a Loans and deposits 
650 4 |a Natural Law 
650 4 |a Maturity mismatching 
650 4 |a Fractional reserves 
650 4 |a Fraud 
650 4 |a Banking 
700 1 |a Howden, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 106(2012), 3, Seite 295-300  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:106  |g year:2012  |g number:3  |g pages:295-300 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41426692  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0996-5  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 106  |j 2012  |e 3  |h 295-300 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 403370325X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785644378 
LOK |0 005 20220112043745 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#B31D03D47FE1EA113240F833F08D71208906FF01 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41426692 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw