Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory

Stakeholder theorists distinguish between normative stakeholders, those who gain moral standing by making contributions to the firm, and derivative stakeholders, those who can constrain the corporate association even though they make no contribution. The board of directors has the legal authority to...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Kaufman, Allen (Author) ; Englander, Ernie (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2011
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2011, Volume: 102, Issue: 3, Pages: 421-438
Further subjects:B team production
B Corporate governance
B Stakeholder Theory
B Board of directors
B Behavioral economics
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785642804
003 DE-627
005 20230710121108.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-011-0822-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785642804 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785642804 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-011-0822-0-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kaufman, Allen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Stakeholder theorists distinguish between normative stakeholders, those who gain moral standing by making contributions to the firm, and derivative stakeholders, those who can constrain the corporate association even though they make no contribution. The board of directors has the legal authority to distinguish among these stakeholder groups and to distribute rights and obligations among these stakeholder groups. To be sure, this stakeholder formulation appropriately seizes on the firm’s voluntary, associative character. Yet, the firm’s constituents contribute assets and incur risks to participate in market, economic activities. And, as such, the firm’s “stakeholders” must share an imperfect language to assist in making two key economic decisions: (1) who are the legitimate and who are the derivative stakeholders; and (2) who should sit on the board? Still, stakeholder theorists have good reason to be skeptical of neoclassical economics. Its assumptions that all act opportunistically and that all can calculate rationally and fully hardly correspond to studies on the managerial experience of corporate coordination. However, advances in behavioral law and economics now provide a cogent economic logic that readily fits into a stakeholder mode. In brief, we argue that (1) the firm’s economic purpose designates legitimacy to core stakeholders, to those who add value, assume unique risk, and can incur harm; (2) the board serves as the principal who coordinates these core stakeholders to sustain competitive advantage and new wealth creation; and (3) state incorporation law, Delaware in particular, reinforces the board’s function. These, in turn, supply selection criteria for board membership. We aim to synchronize concepts from behavioral law and economics with stakeholder theory. 
601 |a Triumph 
601 |a Stakeholder 
650 4 |a team production 
650 4 |a Board of directors 
650 4 |a Corporate Governance 
650 4 |a Stakeholder Theory 
650 4 |a Behavioral economics 
700 1 |a Englander, Ernie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 102(2011), 3, Seite 421-438  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:102  |g year:2011  |g number:3  |g pages:421-438 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476310  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0822-0  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033701680 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785642804 
LOK |0 005 20220112043737 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#CB0B746B9C8BC34F5546A1AD04D5996F03F0C89D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476310 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Corporate governance,Corporate control 
STB 0 0 |a Gouvernement d'entreprise 
STC 0 0 |a Gobierno corporativo 
STD 0 0 |a Corporate governance,Governo d'impresa,Governo d'impresa 
STE 0 0 |a 企业管理,商团治理,公司治理 
STF 0 0 |a 企業管理,商團治理,公司治理 
STG 0 0 |a Governança corporativa 
STH 0 0 |a Корпоративное управление 
STI 0 0 |a Εταιρική διακυβέρνηση,Corporate governance 
SYE 0 0 |a Unternehmenskontrolle,Unternehmensüberwachung