Mattel, Inc.: Global Manufacturing Principles (GMP) – A Life-Cycle Analysis of a Company-Based Code of Conduct in the Toy Industry

Over the last 20+ years, multinational corporations (MNCs) have been confronted with accusations of abuse of market power and unfair and unethical business conduct especially as it relates to their overseas operations and supply chain management. These accusations include, among others, worker explo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Sethi, S. Prakash 1934- (Author) ; Veral, Emre A. (Author) ; Shapiro, H. Jack (Author) ; Emelianova, Olga (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2011
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2011, Volume: 99, Issue: 4, Pages: 483-517
Further subjects:B and Indonesia
B Sweatshops
B Business logistics
B manufacturing in China
B Mattel
B Out sourcing
B Malaysia
B Thailand
B Toy industry
B top management and management incentives
B third party audits
B Corporate Culture
B Voluntary codes of conduct
B Inc
B corporate account- ability
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785641352
003 DE-627
005 20250414235140.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-010-0673-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785641352 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785641352 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-010-0673-0-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)123987288  |0 (DE-627)085567361  |0 (DE-576)177124016  |4 aut  |a Sethi, S. Prakash  |d 1934- 
109 |a Sethi, S. Prakash 1934-  |a Prakash Sethi, S. 1934-  |a Prakash, S. 1934-  |a Pirakash Sethi, S. 1934-  |a Sethi, S. P. 1934- 
245 1 0 |a Mattel, Inc.: Global Manufacturing Principles (GMP) – A Life-Cycle Analysis of a Company-Based Code of Conduct in the Toy Industry 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Over the last 20+ years, multinational corporations (MNCs) have been confronted with accusations of abuse of market power and unfair and unethical business conduct especially as it relates to their overseas operations and supply chain management. These accusations include, among others, worker exploitation in terms of unfairly low wages, excessive work hours, and unsafe work environment; pollution and contamination of air, ground water and land resources; and, undermining the ability of natural government to protect the well-being of their citizens. MNCs have responded to these accusations by creating voluntary codes of conduct which commit them to specific standards for addressing these issues. These codes are created at both the industry-wide and the individual company level. Unfortunately, these codes have generated little credibility and public trust because their compliance claims cannot be independently verified, and they lack transparency and full public disclosure. In this article, we present a case study of the voluntary code of conduct by Mattel, Inc., the world’s largest toy company. The code, called the Global Manufacturing Principles (GMP), confronts the general criticism leveled against voluntary codes of conduct by (a) creating detailed standards of compliance, (b) independent external monitoring of the company’s compliance with its code of conduct, and (c) making full, and uncensored public disclosure of the audit findings and company’s response in terms of remedial action. We present a detailed account of how Mattel’s voluntary code of conduct was created, implemented, and ultimately abandoned over 9 years. We provide an evaluative analysis of the company’s GMP compliance throughout its life span, which suggests a bell-shaped curve, where early top management commitments were met with pockets of resistance from operational groups, who were concerned about balancing GMP compliance efforts with traditional performance criteria. The early stage response from Mattel’s top management was quick and supported with the requisite resources. As a result, the compliance process accelerated, becoming increasingly more robust and effective. The success of code compliance and increased transparency in public disclosure energized field managers with a sense of professional satisfaction and publicly recognized accomplishments. The decline in GMP compliance was equally steep. When all the easily attainable targets had been reached at the company-operated plants, addressing vendor plants’ compliance presented a new set of challenges, which taxed corporate resources and management commitment. It would seem that value-based and ethics-oriented considerations, i.e., doing the right thing for the right reason, were no longer the driving force for Mattel’s management. Mattel did not see any economic benefit from its proactive stance, when competitors did not seem to suffer adverse consequences for not following suit. The final contributing factor to the code’s abandonment was a widely publicized series of product recalls which absorbed top management’s attention. 
601 |a Industrie 
650 4 |a top management and management incentives 
650 4 |a Corporate Culture 
650 4 |a and Indonesia 
650 4 |a Thailand 
650 4 |a Malaysia 
650 4 |a manufacturing in China 
650 4 |a Toy industry 
650 4 |a Inc 
650 4 |a Mattel 
650 4 |a third party audits 
650 4 |a corporate account- ability 
650 4 |a Supply Chain Management 
650 4 |a Outsourcing 
650 4 |a Sweatshops 
650 4 |a Voluntary codes of conduct 
700 1 |a Veral, Emre A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Shapiro, H. Jack  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Emelianova, Olga  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 99(2011), 4, Seite 483-517  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:99  |g year:2011  |g number:4  |g pages:483-517 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476213  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0673-0  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
883 |8 1  |a cgwrk  |d 20250403  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033700234 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785641352 
LOK |0 005 20220112043731 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#2ED238BE85B4C6528764ED14F5E850F9F3D6733B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476213 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Business logistics,Out sourcing,Thailand,Southern Thailand 
STB 0 0 |a Externalisation,Logistique (gestion) 
STC 0 0 |a Administración de la cadena de suministro,Tercerización 
STD 0 0 |a Gestione della catena di distribuzione,Outsourcing,Esternalizzazione,Esternalizzazione 
STF 0 0 |a 供应链管理,外判 
STG 0 0 |a Gestão da cadeia de suprimentos,Terceirização 
STH 0 0 |a Аутсорсинг,Управление цепями поставок 
STI 0 0 |a Διαχείριση εφοδιαστικής αλυσίδας,Εξωτερική ανάθεση,Outsourcing,Ανάθεση σε τρίτους,Εξωπορισμός 
SYE 0 0 |a Pradésa Dai,Prathet Thai,Muang Thai,Thai,Prathet T'hai,Muang T'hai,Pratet Thai,Pradésa-Daiy,Praḥ-desa-Daiy,Rāja-ʾaāṇā-cǎkra-Daiy,Königreich Thailand,Kingdom of Thailand , Persekutuan Malaysia,Federation of Malaysia,Staatenbund von Malaysia,Persekutuan Tanah Malaysia,Föderation von Malaysia,Malaiziia,Ma-lai-hsi-ya,Malaisie,Government of Malaysia , Lieferkettenmanagement,Lieferkette,Versorgungskettenmanagement,Supply-Chain-Management,SCM,Supply Network Management,Supply chain management system,SCM system , Funktionsbezogene Ausgliederung,Funktionsausgliederung