Double Standards: The Role of Techniques of Neutralization

Despite the growing number of studies examining consumers’ perceptions of unethical corporate and consumer practices, research examining the apparent double standard existing between what consumers perceive as acceptable corporate behaviour and what they believe are acceptable consumer practices rem...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: De Bock, Tine (Author) ; Van Kenhove, Patrick (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2011
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2011, Volume: 99, Issue: 2, Pages: 283-296
Further subjects:B ethical beliefs
B double standards
B Techniques of neutralization
B corporate ethics
B Consumer ethics
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785641239
003 DE-627
005 20250105235615.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-010-0654-3  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785641239 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785641239 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-010-0654-3-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)141619309  |0 (DE-627)629825890  |0 (DE-576)324994907  |4 aut  |a De Bock, Tine 
109 |a De Bock, Tine  |a De Bock, T.  |a Bock, Tine de 
245 1 0 |a Double Standards: The Role of Techniques of Neutralization 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Despite the growing number of studies examining consumers’ perceptions of unethical corporate and consumer practices, research examining the apparent double standard existing between what consumers perceive as acceptable corporate behaviour and what they believe are acceptable consumer practices remains scarce. Contradictory, double standards are often quoted by other researchers as a major stream in ethical literature. The few studies dealing with this topic as well as this study indicate that people rate corporate unethical actions as less admissible compared to similar consumer misactions. However, little is known about the processes underlying these double standards. This research investigates whether the techniques of neutralization could provide a meaningful way of approaching this phenomenon. Findings indicate that the higher the extent to which people agree with arguments explaining away the misbehaviour instigated by consumers or business, the more they tolerate these questionable consumer and corporate practices. Furthermore and more importantly, these techniques give an answer on the question why people judge business (representatives) more harshly than consumers. More specifically, results show that the same respondents who justify questionable consumer actions to a certain degree, condone the same misbehaviours instigated by business (representatives) to a much lesser extent. In this way, the techniques of neutralization concern a process explaining the double standard phenomenon. 
650 4 |a Techniques of neutralization 
650 4 |a ethical beliefs 
650 4 |a double standards 
650 4 |a corporate ethics 
650 4 |a Consumer ethics 
700 1 |8 2\p  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)17189734X  |0 (DE-627)362730296  |0 (DE-576)132652692  |4 aut  |a Van Kenhove, Patrick 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 99(2011), 2, Seite 283-296  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:99  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:283-296 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476197  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0654-3  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
883 |8 1\p  |a cgwrk  |d 20241001  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
883 |8 2\p  |a cgwrk  |d 20241001  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033700110 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785641239 
LOK |0 005 20220112043730 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#CFEA99569A0179A8F4A3436B3ECADD76712E3384 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476197 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw