Self-regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Business Case: Do they Work in Achieving Workplace Equality and Safety?

The political shift toward an economic liberalism in many developed market economies, emphasizing the importance of the marketplace rather than government intervention in the economy and society (Dorman, Systematic Occupational Health and Safety Management: Perspectives on an International Developme...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hart, Susan Margaret (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2010
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2010, Volume: 92, Issue: 4, Pages: 585-600
Further subjects:B Corporate social responsibility
B workplace equality
B workplace safety
B Globalization
B Business Case
B Self-regulation
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785638238
003 DE-627
005 20230331053059.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-009-0174-1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785638238 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785638238 
035 |a (DE-He213)s10551-009-0174-1-e 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hart, Susan Margaret  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Self-regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Business Case: Do they Work in Achieving Workplace Equality and Safety? 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The political shift toward an economic liberalism in many developed market economies, emphasizing the importance of the marketplace rather than government intervention in the economy and society (Dorman, Systematic Occupational Health and Safety Management: Perspectives on an International Development, 2000; Tombs, Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 3(1):24–25, 2005; Walters, Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 03(2):3–19, 2005), featured a prominent discourse centered on the need for business flexibility and competitiveness in a global economy (Dorman, 2000; Tombs, 2005). Alongside these developments was an increasing pressure for corporate social responsibility (CSR). The business case for CSR – that corporations would benefit from voluntarily being socially responsible – was increasingly promoted by governments and corporations as part of the justification for self-regulation. The aim of the article is to examine more closely the proposition that self-regulation is effective, with particular reference to the business case for workplace equality and safety. Based on a comprehensive literature review and documentary analysis, it was found that current predominant management discourse and practice focusing on diversity and safety management systems (OHSMS) resonate well with a government and corporate preference for the business case and self-regulation. However, the centrality of individual rather than organizational factors in diversity and OHSMS means that systemic discrimination and inherent workplace hazards are downplayed, making it less likely that employers will initiate structural remedies needed for real change. Thus, reliance on the business case in the argument for self-regulation is problematic. In terms of government policy and management practice, the business case needs to be supplemented by strong, proactive legislation, and worker involvement. 
650 4 |a workplace safety 
650 4 |a workplace equality 
650 4 |a Corporate Social Responsibility 
650 4 |a Business Case 
650 4 |a Globalization 
650 4 |a Self-regulation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 92(2010), 4, Seite 585-600  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:92  |g year:2010  |g number:4  |g pages:585-600 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40605318  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0174-1  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 92  |j 2010  |e 4  |h 585-600 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 403369711X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785638238 
LOK |0 005 20220112043719 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#41C930B14E6011EDDD1B5DE098BC5B0580C07951 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40605318 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility 
STB 0 0 |a Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise 
STC 0 0 |a Responsabilidad social de la empresa 
STD 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility,Responsabilità sociale d'impresa,Responsabilità sociale d'impresa 
STF 0 0 |a 企業社會責任 
STG 0 0 |a Responsabilidade social da empresa 
STH 0 0 |a Корпоративная социальная ответственность 
STI 0 0 |a Εταιρική κοινωνική ευθύνη,Corporate social responsibility 
SYE 0 0 |a Corporate social responsibility,Corporate citizenship,Corporate environment responsibility,Corporate environmental responsibility,Corporate responsibility,Corporate sustainability management,Corporate volunteering,CSR (Corporate social responsibility),Environmental social governance,ESG,Gesellschaftliche Unternehmensverantwortung,Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen,Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen,Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement,Soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen,Soziales Engagement von Unternehmen,Unternehmensverantwortung,Unternehmerische Sozialverantwortung,CSR,Corporate Citizenship,Unternehmerische Gesellschaftsverantwortung,Unternehmerische Sozialverantwortung,Unternehmen