An Optimally Viable Version of Stakeholder Theory
This article is the final one in a series of four papers investigating the stakeholder approach to running businesses. It argues that the optimally viable version of that approach is one in which employees have a co-equal status as stakeholders with shareholders (the maximum allowed for under stakeh...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2009
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2009, Volume: 86, Issue: 3, Pages: 297-312 |
| Further subjects: | B
work-related risk
B contributory principle B co-determination B economic functioning B Stakeholder (corporate) B stockholder B Risk B competitive collaboration |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785634224 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230331052953.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-008-9848-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785634224 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785634224 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-008-9848-3-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kaler, J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An Optimally Viable Version of Stakeholder Theory |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article is the final one in a series of four papers investigating the stakeholder approach to running businesses. It argues that the optimally viable version of that approach is one in which employees have a co-equal status as stakeholders with shareholders (the maximum allowed for under stakeholder theory) while other groupings only have a minimal status as stakeholders and are generally restricted to just customers, suppliers, and lenders. This version is argued for on the grounds that it both overcomes the implementation problems attendant upon having to serve the interests of a range of groupings and is justified in terms of stakeholder membership being confined to those groupings with a claim on the services of a business in virtue of directly contributing to its economic functioning. The ranking of non-shareholder stakeholders in the recommended version and, in particular, the maximal ranking granted to employees is argued to reflect the scale of the various contributions as measured by the degree to which making it exposes those stakeholders to both financial risk and a non-financial “work-related” risk peculiar to employees. It is concluded that although this is the best available version of the stakeholder approach it may not be the best of all possible ways of running a business. | ||
| 601 | |a Stakeholder | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a work-related risk | |
| 650 | 4 | |a stockholder | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stakeholder | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk | |
| 650 | 4 | |a economic functioning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a contributory principle | |
| 650 | 4 | |a competitive collaboration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a co-determination | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 86(2009), 3, Seite 297-312 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:86 |g year:2009 |g number:3 |g pages:297-312 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294891 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9848-3 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 86 |j 2009 |e 3 |h 297-312 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033693106 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785634224 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043702 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#E624EF8C892B2EABDCCEEEEA3D99443D6936B19D | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294891 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder (corporate) |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Partie prenante,Stakeholder,Stakeholder |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Parte interesada |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder,Portatore di interessi,Portatore di interessi |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 持份者,利益相关者 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 持份者,利益相關者 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Parte interessada |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Стейкхолдер |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder,Ενδιαφερόμενο μέρος |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Anspruchsgruppe,Anspruchspartner |