A Comparison of Models Describing the Impact of Moral Decision Making on Investment Decisions
As moral decision making in financial markets incorporates moral considerations into investment decisions, some rational decision theorists argue that moral considerations would introduce inefficiency to investment decisions. However, market demand for socially responsible investment is increasing,...
Authors: | ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer
2008
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2008, Volume: 82, Issue: 1, Pages: 171-187 |
Further subjects: | B
Ethics
B Decision theory B Behavioral economics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 178563139X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230710121010.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-007-9570-6 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)178563139X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP178563139X | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-007-9570-6-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hofmann, Eva |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Comparison of Models Describing the Impact of Moral Decision Making on Investment Decisions |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a As moral decision making in financial markets incorporates moral considerations into investment decisions, some rational decision theorists argue that moral considerations would introduce inefficiency to investment decisions. However, market demand for socially responsible investment is increasing, suggesting that investment decisions are influenced by both financial and moral considerations. Several models can be applied to explain moral behavior. We test the suitability of (a) multiple attribute utility theory (MAUT), (b) theory of planned behavior, and (c) issue-contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. In an experimental setting, 141 participants traded company shares in a computerized asset market. Over 12 periods, companies varied in morality (i.e., treatment of employees) and in profitability (i.e., expected dividends per share). Participants’ bids and asks for shares were recorded. Results indicate that moral considerations influence investment decisions, controlling for profit. Differences between the three models are discussed. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Behavioral economics | |
650 | 4 | |a Decision theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
700 | 1 | |a Hoelzl, Erik |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kirchler, Erich |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 82(2008), 1, Seite 171-187 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g year:2008 |g number:1 |g pages:171-187 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482281 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9570-6 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033690271 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 178563139X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112043650 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#55DCCB671C269C672E52C7D5CF11E624455A5FD0 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482281 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |