Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation
The success of the stakeholder theory in management literature as well as in current business practices is largely due to the inherent simplicity of the stakeholder model––and to the clarity of Freeman’s powerful synthesised visual conceptualisation. However, over the years, critics have attacked th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2008
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2008, Volume: 80, Issue: 4, Pages: 879-888 |
| Further subjects: | B
Stakeholder Theory
B Stakeholder (corporate) B stakeholder model B Strategy B Freeman’s model B stakeholder reciprocity B graphical framework |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785630636 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230331052854.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-007-9474-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785630636 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785630636 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-007-9474-5-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fassin, Yves |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Fassin, Yves | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The success of the stakeholder theory in management literature as well as in current business practices is largely due to the inherent simplicity of the stakeholder model––and to the clarity of Freeman’s powerful synthesised visual conceptualisation. However, over the years, critics have attacked the vagueness and ambiguity of stakeholder theory. In this article, rather than building on the discussion from a theoretical point of view, a radically different and innovative approach is chosen: the graphical framework is used as the central perspective. The major shortcomings of the popular stakeholder framework are systematically confronted with the graphical scheme to illustrate their visual impact. The graphical illustrations of the imperfections help explain the sometimes-oversimplified generalisation inherent to every graphical model. They also make some interrelationships easier to understand. The analysis demonstrates that, with the tacit but implicit acceptance of simplification of the discussed explanatory elements, Freeman’s framework remains a rather good approximation of reality. Only a few minor changes to the stakeholder model are consequently proposed. | ||
| 601 | |a Stakeholder | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Strategy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stakeholder Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a stakeholder reciprocity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a stakeholder model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stakeholder | |
| 650 | 4 | |a graphical framework | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Freeman’s model | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 80(2008), 4, Seite 879-888 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:80 |g year:2008 |g number:4 |g pages:879-888 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482187 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9474-5 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 80 |j 2008 |e 4 |h 879-888 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033689516 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785630636 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043647 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#1370A1198C80FBB8218887980DA225C84FFCAE51 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482187 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder (corporate) |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Partie prenante,Stakeholder,Stakeholder |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Parte interesada |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder,Portatore di interessi,Portatore di interessi |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 持份者,利益相关者 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 持份者,利益相關者 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Parte interessada |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Стейкхолдер |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder,Ενδιαφερόμενο μέρος |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Anspruchsgruppe,Anspruchspartner |