Relative Importance Measurement of the Moral Intensity Dimensions
The relative importance of the Jones’ [Jones, T. M.: 1991, Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395] six components of moral intensity was measured using a conjoint experimental design. The most important components influencing ethical perceptions were: probability of effect, magnitude of consequ...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2008
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2008, Volume: 80, Issue: 3, Pages: 613-626 |
| Further subjects: | B
probability of effect
B temporal immediacy B magnitude of consequences B Proximity B social consensus B Conjoint analysis B concentration of effect B Moral Intensity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785630474 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230331052853.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-007-9458-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785630474 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785630474 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-007-9458-5-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tsalikis, John |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Relative Importance Measurement of the Moral Intensity Dimensions |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The relative importance of the Jones’ [Jones, T. M.: 1991, Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395] six components of moral intensity was measured using a conjoint experimental design. The most important components influencing ethical perceptions were: probability of effect, magnitude of consequences, and temporal immediacy. Contrary to previous research, overall social consensus was not an important factor. However, consumers exhibit distinctly different patterns in ethical evaluation, and for approximately 15% of respondents social consensus was the most important dimension. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a temporal immediacy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a social consensus | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Proximity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a probability of effect | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral Intensity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a magnitude of consequences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conjoint analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a concentration of effect | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Seaton, Bruce |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shepherd, Philip |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 80(2008), 3, Seite 613-626 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:80 |g year:2008 |g number:3 |g pages:613-626 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482168 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9458-5 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 80 |j 2008 |e 3 |h 613-626 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033689354 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785630474 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043646 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#2EBE3527A3FA57D21BC3C3C84BA835DD228DA38D | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482168 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||