Freedom of Conscience, Employee Prerogatives, and Consumer Choice: Veal, Birth Control, and Tanning Beds
Does a pharmacist have a right to refuse to fill certain prescriptions? In this paper, I examine cases in which an employee might refuse to do something that is part of his or her job description. I will argue that in some of these cases, an employee does have a right of refusal and in other cases a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2008
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2008, Volume: 77, Issue: 2, Pages: 191-203 |
Further subjects: | B
pharmacist refusals
B birth control prescriptions B Consumer rights B employee rights B freedom of conscience |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785629018 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230427062126.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-006-9308-x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785629018 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785629018 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-006-9308-x-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dieterle, J. M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Freedom of Conscience, Employee Prerogatives, and Consumer Choice: Veal, Birth Control, and Tanning Beds |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Does a pharmacist have a right to refuse to fill certain prescriptions? In this paper, I examine cases in which an employee might refuse to do something that is part of his or her job description. I will argue that in some of these cases, an employee does have a right of refusal and in other cases an employee does not. In those cases where the employee does not have a right of refusal, I argue that the refusals (if repeated) are just cause for termination of employment. I argue that there are moral principles that support the different outcomes in the cases under consideration. I turn to pharmacy cases at the end of the paper and argue that they are analogous to cases where an employee does not have a right of refusal and thus fall under the principle that refusing to fill birth control prescriptions constitutes just cause for termination. | ||
601 | |a Controlling | ||
650 | 4 | |a pharmacist refusals | |
650 | 4 | |a freedom of conscience | |
650 | 4 | |a employee rights | |
650 | 4 | |a Consumer rights | |
650 | 4 | |a birth control prescriptions | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 77(2008), 2, Seite 191-203 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2008 |g number:2 |g pages:191-203 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075553 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9308-x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 77 |j 2008 |e 2 |h 191-203 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033687890 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785629018 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112043641 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#E6E42252B181CAA4027369AA2B7657F8EEE7B7F5 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075553 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |