Evaluating Stakeholder Theory
This paper is the third in a series of four that is directed at understanding and assessing stakeholder theory for the purposes of business ethics. It addresses the suitability and viability of the theory, rejecting objections of a moral and efficiency sort based (respectively) on claims about prope...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer
2006
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2006, Volume: 69, Issue: 3, Pages: 249-268 |
| Further subjects: | B
stakeholder identification
B Japan B Influencer B stockholder B stakeholder economies B Corporate social responsibility B UK B Stakeholder (corporate) B Anglo-Saxon economies B stockholder economies B claimant B US B Germany |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785626736 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230710120946.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-006-9089-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785626736 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785626736 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-006-9089-2-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kaler, J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluating Stakeholder Theory |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper is the third in a series of four that is directed at understanding and assessing stakeholder theory for the purposes of business ethics. It addresses the suitability and viability of the theory, rejecting objections of a moral and efficiency sort based (respectively) on claims about property rights and the economic superiority of the alternative stockholder approach, but accepting that implementation problems require limiting both the number of groupings admitted to stakeholder status and the degree of responsibility towards them. The conclusion looks forward to the construction of a suitably limited version of the stakeholder approach in a fourth paper drawing upon this one and the previous two. | ||
| 601 | |a Stakeholder | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a US | |
| 650 | 4 | |a UK | |
| 650 | 4 | |a stockholder economies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a stockholder | |
| 650 | 4 | |a stakeholder identification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a stakeholder economies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stakeholder | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Japan | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Influencer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Germany | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Corporate Social Responsibility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a claimant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Anglo-Saxon economies | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 69(2006), 3, Seite 249-268 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:69 |g year:2006 |g number:3 |g pages:249-268 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123954 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9089-2 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 403368560X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785626736 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043631 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#DE7370CC1176165EB12A0F1DDBA9E949498FF776 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123954 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Corporate social responsibility,Influencer,Stakeholder (corporate) |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Influenceur web,Partie prenante,Stakeholder,Stakeholder,Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Influencer,Parte interesada,Responsabilidad social de la empresa |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Corporate social responsibility,Responsabilità sociale d'impresa,Responsabilità sociale d'impresa,Stakeholder,Portatore di interessi,Portatore di interessi |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 持份者,利益相关者 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 企業社會責任,持份者,利益相關者 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Influenciador,Parte interessada,Responsabilidade social da empresa |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Инфлюэнсер,Корпоративная социальная ответственность,Стейкхолдер |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Stakeholder,Ενδιαφερόμενο μέρος,Εταιρική κοινωνική ευθύνη,Corporate social responsibility |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Anspruchsgruppe,Anspruchspartner , Empire du Japon,Nihon-koku,Zen-Nihon,Zenkoku,Nippon,Japon,Dainihon,Dainippon,Nihon,Nippon,Yapan,Japão,Nihon , Corporate social responsibility,Corporate citizenship,Corporate environment responsibility,Corporate environmental responsibility,Corporate responsibility,Corporate sustainability management,Corporate volunteering,CSR (Corporate social responsibility),Environmental social governance,ESG,Gesellschaftliche Unternehmensverantwortung,Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen,Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen,Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement,Soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen,Soziales Engagement von Unternehmen,Unternehmensverantwortung,Unternehmerische Sozialverantwortung,CSR,Corporate Citizenship,Unternehmerische Gesellschaftsverantwortung,Unternehmerische Sozialverantwortung,Unternehmen |