What Global Emission Regulations Should Corporations Support?

In their role as political actors and lobbyists, corporations have responsibilities to help determine the existence and content of global regulations of pollutants. The ethical nature of those responsibilities is highly sensitive to the assumed normative framework. This paper compares several framew...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burress, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2005
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2005, Volume: 60, Issue: 4, Pages: 317-339
Further subjects:B neoclassical-theory
B Pollution
B benefit-cost-analysis
B laissez-faire-ideology
B Globalization
B Utilitarianism
B emissions-marketing
B emission-regulation
B stakeholder-theory sustainability
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1785624253
003 DE-627
005 20220112043619.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-004-6942-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785624253 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785624253 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Burress, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a What Global Emission Regulations Should Corporations Support? 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In their role as political actors and lobbyists, corporations have responsibilities to help determine the existence and content of global regulations of pollutants. The ethical nature of those responsibilities is highly sensitive to the assumed normative framework. This paper compares several frameworks by modeling them as differently weighted versions of utilitarianism. Under a strict neoclassical approach, corporations have a narrow obligation to maximize profits, which generally entails opposing emission regulations. In contrast, a stakeholder approach as well as Marxian and common ethics approaches suggest that firms have an obligation to actively support sustainable emission regulations with the following properties , major restrictions would be global rather than local, global restrictions would apply in all cases of persistent emissions, global restrictions would apply to non-persistent emissions as well, unless they have been affirmatively shown to be safe using reasonably persuasive scientific evidence, safety thresholds would be set fairly restrictively, based on administrative models and rules of thumb, in light of existing scientific knowledge but without requiring full scientific justification, long-run goals would include zero emission of persistent unsafe substances., However, the stakeholder approach supports phase-in rules to mitigate short-run compliance costs. 
650 4 |a Utilitarianism 
650 4 |a stakeholder-theory sustainability 
650 4 |a Pollution 
650 4 |a neoclassical-theory 
650 4 |a laissez-faire-ideology 
650 4 |a Globalization 
650 4 |a emission-regulation 
650 4 |a emissions-marketing 
650 4 |a benefit-cost-analysis 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 60(2005), 4, Seite 317-339  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:60  |g year:2005  |g number:4  |g pages:317-339 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123587  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-6942-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033683127 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785624253 
LOK |0 005 20220112043619 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#2C0523B6E51BD22E72AD1EEFA15D5A7DC7DC9779 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123587 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw