Thinking and Acting Outside the Neo-classical Economic Box: Reply to McMurtry
This paper responds to Professor John McMurtry, primarily to his critique (Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44, 2003) of my recent book, Economics as Moral Science (Springer-Verlag, 2001). Although agreeing with my attribution of a moral a priorism” to orthodox or neo-classical economics, McMurtry t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2005
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2005, Volume: 56, Issue: 3, Pages: 289-303 |
| Further subjects: | B
Neo-classical economics
B scientific rationality B moral values |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785623176 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112043613.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-004-4648-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785623176 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785623176 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hodgson, Bernard |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Thinking and Acting Outside the Neo-classical Economic Box: Reply to McMurtry |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper responds to Professor John McMurtry, primarily to his critique (Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44, 2003) of my recent book, Economics as Moral Science (Springer-Verlag, 2001). Although agreeing with my attribution of a moral a priorism” to orthodox or neo-classical economics, McMurtry takes issue with my “conversion thesis”, that ana priori, ethically committed theory can be transformed into a testable empirical science of actual behaviour through the application of institutional constraints to individual motivations. McMurtry views such a thesis as “logically possible but morally abhorrent”. In so doing, he ascribes a version of economic determinism to me which, he claims, leads me to mistakenly understand the neo-classical paradigm as circumscribing the “boundaries of reality itself” and thereby entrenching the life-destructive values presupposed by this paradigm. I reject such a reading of Economics as Moral Science and explain the manner in which it is inconsistent both with the theoretical substance and practical agenda of my work. I propose that the irreducible basis of disagreement remains one wherein I believe that a more radical reform of the capitalist market order is mandatory to establish more defensible moral ideals than does McMurtry. My reply closes by recommending a constitutional partitioning of material goods such that we may more securely act outside the ethical constraints of neo-classical theory | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a moral values | |
| 650 | 4 | |a scientific rationality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neo-classical economics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 56(2005), 3, Seite 289-303 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:56 |g year:2005 |g number:3 |g pages:289-303 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123432 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-4648-x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 56 |j 2005 |e 3 |h 289-303 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 403368204X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785623176 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043613 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#D8C21464912F44E70B7A81208675EB5802351BE3 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123432 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||