Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a must for Public Pension Funds – Because there is no Better Alternative

>With assets of over US$1.0 trillion and growing, public pension funds in the United States have become a major force in the private sector through their holding of equity positions in large publicly traded corporations. More recently, these funds have been expanding their investment strategy by...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Sethi, S. Prakash (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2005
В: Journal of business ethics
Год: 2005, Том: 56, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 99-129
Другие ключевые слова:B socially responsible investing (SRI)
B socially responsible corporate conduct (SRCC)
B Корпоративное управление
B public pension funds
B financial intermediaries
B Free Rider
B Public Goods
Online-ссылка: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1785623060
003 DE-627
005 20220112043613.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-004-5455-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785623060 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785623060 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sethi, S. Prakash  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a must for Public Pension Funds – Because there is no Better Alternative 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a >With assets of over US$1.0 trillion and growing, public pension funds in the United States have become a major force in the private sector through their holding of equity positions in large publicly traded corporations. More recently, these funds have been expanding their investment strategy by considering a corporation’s long-term risks on issues such as environmental protection, sustainability, and good corporate citizenship, and how these factors impact a company’s long-term performance. Conventional wisdom argues that the fiduciary responsibility of the pension funds’ trustees must be solely focused on their beneficiaries and, therefore, their investment criteria must be based strictly on narrowly defined financial measures. It is also asserted that well-established financial measurements of corporate performance already include long-term risk assessment through discounted present value of future flow of earnings. Consequently, all other criteria are contrary to the best interest of the pension funds’ beneficiaries. In this paper, we assert that, contrary to conventional wisdom, pension funds, and for that matter other mutual funds, must be concerned with the long-term survival and growth of corporations. These measures are generally referred to “socially responsible investing’’ (SRI) and when applied to corporations, it is termed “socially responsible corporate conduct (SRCC).” We demonstrate that current measurement of future risk assessment invariably understates, and quite often completely overlooks, these long-term risks because of the inherent bias towards short-run on the part of financial intermediaries whose compensation depends greatly on short-term results. Furthermore, there is ample evidence to suggest that these intermediaries have been engaging in self-serving practices and thus failing in their duties to serve their clients’, i.e. pension funds’, best interests. Because of their large holdings in the total market as well as individual companies, these funds cannot easily divest from poorly performing companies without destabilizing the companies’ stock and overall markets. Hence, they must opt for a strategy of emphasizing investment criteria that encourage companies to take into account long-term aspects of their operations in terms of their impact on environment, sustainability, and community welfare, to name a few. We argue that an exclusionary, and even a primary, focus on short-term financial criteria is no longer a viable option. It also calls for the pension funds to encourage greater transparency and accountability of the entire corporate sector through improved corporate governance. Thus socially responsible investing practices are not merely discretionary and desirable activities; they are a necessary imperative, which both the corporations and public pension funds, and other large institutional holders, will ignore at serious peril to themselves. Finally, the paper considers some of the recent developments where corporations have been responding to these challenges and how their actions might be strengthened through greater disclosure and transparency of corporate activities. It also makes recommendations for the pension funds to support further research in creating new measurement standards that further refine the concept of socially responsible investing as a necessary ingredient of long-term corporate survival and growth in the context of a changing economic, environmental and socio-political dynamic. 
601 |a Pension 
650 4 |a financial intermediaries 
650 4 |a Public Goods 
650 4 |a Free Rider 
650 4 |a Corporate Governance 
650 4 |a public pension funds 
650 4 |a socially responsible corporate conduct (SRCC) 
650 4 |a socially responsible investing (SRI) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 56(2005), 2, Seite 99-129  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:56  |g year:2005  |g number:2  |g pages:99-129 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123418  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-5455-0  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033681930 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785623060 
LOK |0 005 20220112043613 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#1F3FE28D44F8FEE85F0D6CC36A8829BDC8040CAE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25123418 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Corporate governance,Corporate control 
STB 0 0 |a Gouvernement d'entreprise 
STC 0 0 |a Gobierno corporativo 
STD 0 0 |a Corporate governance,Governo d'impresa,Governo d'impresa 
STE 0 0 |a 企业管理,商团治理,公司治理 
STF 0 0 |a 企業管理,商團治理,公司治理 
STG 0 0 |a Governança corporativa 
STH 0 0 |a Корпоративное управление 
STI 0 0 |a Εταιρική διακυβέρνηση,Corporate governance 
SYE 0 0 |a Unternehmenskontrolle,Unternehmensüberwachung