An Ethical Perspective on CEO Compensation

The controversial issue of whether Chief Executive Officer (CEO) compensation is excessive or appropriate is examined in terms of two competing claims: that CEOs are overpaid for the value they provide to an enterprise, and that CEO compensation is inherently equitable. Various arguments and perspec...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perel, Mel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2003
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2003, Volume: 48, Issue: 4, Pages: 381-391
Further subjects:B excessive compensation
B Business Ethics
B stock options
B Compensation
B Board of directors
B overpaid CEOs
B CEO compensation
B compensation committees
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1785620770
003 DE-627
005 20220112043601.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005803.24077.55  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785620770 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785620770 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Perel, Mel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a An Ethical Perspective on CEO Compensation 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The controversial issue of whether Chief Executive Officer (CEO) compensation is excessive or appropriate is examined in terms of two competing claims: that CEOs are overpaid for the value they provide to an enterprise, and that CEO compensation is inherently equitable. Various arguments and perspectives on both sides of the issue are assessed. Little evidence supports the claim that CEO performance justifies very high compensation. Further, the complex interactive alliance between boards of directors and CEOs compromises rational decision-making about CEO compensation, with the Enron affair offered as an illustration of what can go wrong when dishonest CEO actions combine with lax board oversight. Recommendations for restoring trust in the system include continuing current regulatory actions, using different metrics for determining CEO compensation, making board member-CEO relationships transparent to all company stakeholders, and several more radical ideas for change. Stakeholders must resist being distracted by other social, economic, or political issues from pursuing serious, lasting reform. 
650 4 |a stock options 
650 4 |a overpaid CEOs 
650 4 |a excessive compensation 
650 4 |a compensation committees 
650 4 |a Compensation 
650 4 |a CEO compensation 
650 4 |a Business Ethics 
650 4 |a Board of directors 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 48(2003), 4, Seite 381-391  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2003  |g number:4  |g pages:381-391 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075192  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005803.24077.55  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033679642 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785620770 
LOK |0 005 20220112043601 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#BDFD37D7A355529E2C33ED4B2984BEB0F70B56E1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075192 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw