The Effect of Friendly Persuasion and Gender on Tax Comliance Behavior
Friendly persuasion, in contrast to deterrent measures like tax audits and penalties on underreported taxes, is a positive and possibly a cost effective method of increasing taxpayer compliance. However, prior studies have failed to show that friendly persuasion has a significant impact on complianc...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer
2003
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2003, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 133-145 |
| Further subjects: | B
personal consequences
B generating and reading reasons B normative appeals B income tax reporting |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785620282 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112043559.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1026004716676 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785620282 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785620282 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chung, Janne |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Effect of Friendly Persuasion and Gender on Tax Comliance Behavior |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Friendly persuasion, in contrast to deterrent measures like tax audits and penalties on underreported taxes, is a positive and possibly a cost effective method of increasing taxpayer compliance. However, prior studies have failed to show that friendly persuasion has a significant impact on compliance (Blumenthal et al., 2001; McGraw and Scholz, 1991). In our study, in contrast to prior studies, we examine the impact of generating and reading reasons supporting compliance as friendly persuasion on individuals' income reporting behavior as well as control for gender effects. Specifically, we predict an interaction effect between friendly persuasion and gender on compliance behavior. We carried out a 2 (friendly persuasion and control) × 2 (men and women) full factorial experiment, where participants earned $30 by completing two questionnaires. Participants in the friendly persuasion group were required first to generate and second to read a list of reasons why they should comply fully. Afterwards, participants in both groups were asked to report the income they earned and pay tax on the reported income. The results show a significant main effect for gender as well as a significant interaction effect between gender and friendly persuasion on income reported. Women in the friendly persuasion group reported significantly higher income compared to men in that group. Other comparisons were not significant. Policy implications for increasing taxpayers' ethics and compliance are highlighted. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a personal consequences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a normative appeals | |
| 650 | 4 | |a income tax reporting | |
| 650 | 4 | |a generating and reading reasons | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Trivedi, Vaswanath Umashanker |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 47(2003), 2, Seite 133-145 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2003 |g number:2 |g pages:133-145 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075133 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026004716676 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033679154 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785620282 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043559 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#C24B3A1E320B56F40DAFEE991591FF346171D079 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075133 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||