Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility

There is a clear tendency in contemporary political/legal thought to limit agency to individual agents, thereby denying the existence and relevance of collective moral agency in general, and corporate agency in particular. This tendency is ultimately rooted in two particular forms of individualism –...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Soares, C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2003
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2003, Volume: 46, Issue: 2, Pages: 143-150
Further subjects:B Agency
B realist
B Individual
B nominalists
B Moral Responsibility
B Corporate Moral Agency
B individualist
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785619993
003 DE-627
005 20220112043558.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1025061632660  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785619993 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785619993 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Soares, C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There is a clear tendency in contemporary political/legal thought to limit agency to individual agents, thereby denying the existence and relevance of collective moral agency in general, and corporate agency in particular. This tendency is ultimately rooted in two particular forms of individualism – methodological and fictive (abstract) – which have their source in the Enlightenment. Furthermore, the dominant notion of moral agency owes a lot to Kant whose moral/legal philosophy is grounded exclusively on abstract reason and personal autonomy, to the detriment of a due recognition of the socio-historical grounds of moral social conduct., I shall argue that an adequate theory of responsibility is needed, which does not only take into account individual responsibility, but also collective and corporate responsibility, capable of taking into consideration society and its problems. Furthermore, corporations are consciously and carefully structured organisations with different levels of management and have clearly defined aims and objectives, a central feature upon which I shall be focussing in this paper. 
601 |a Individuation 
650 4 |a realist 
650 4 |a nominalists 
650 4 |a Moral Responsibility 
650 4 |a individualist 
650 4 |a Individual 
650 4 |a Corporate Moral Agency 
650 4 |a Agency 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 46(2003), 2, Seite 143-150  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:46  |g year:2003  |g number:2  |g pages:143-150 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075096  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025061632660  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 46  |j 2003  |e 2  |h 143-150 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033678867 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785619993 
LOK |0 005 20220112043558 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#7F669BF6D5539C6F4CBC8B1142349599C9F58380 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075096 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw